Yes, you are right...thank you :) I guess my reasoning only applies if using shared table, no replication and therefore always adding path.
Charles On 14 Sep 2013 19:32, "Juha Heinanen" <[email protected]> wrote: > Charles Chance writes: > > > Yes, we could use a separate table for each registrar and replicate > > registrations to all of them. But we still need to add Path to ensure > > invites etc go via the server each client used to register (due to client > > NAT). And if that is local to the lookup, it still makes sense to ignore > > the path as it is itself. > > load_contacts() automatically prioritizes contacts so that one without > path has higher priority. so, no changes are needed to current code. > > -- juha > > _______________________________________________ > sr-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev > -- www.sipcentric.com Follow us on twitter @sipcentric <http://twitter.com/sipcentric> Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered office: Unit 10 iBIC, Birmingham Science Park, Holt Court South, Birmingham B7 4EJ.
_______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
