THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.

The following task has a new comment added:

FS#351 - registrar: process expired contacts first
User who did this - VĂ­ctor Seva (linuxmaniac)

----------
Created new db_update_ucontact_instance and call it instead of 
db_update_ucontact_addr.

This fixes the update on the ddbb. If I send two different register messages 
for the second, first with Contact: 
<sip:[email protected]:50602;ob>;expires=593;+sip.instance="<urn:uuid:C3DD6013-20E8-40E3-8EA2-5849B02ED0C4>";reg-id=1
and the second with  Contact: <sip:[email protected]:6666;ob>;expires=0

I get the right result: [email protected]:50602;ob on mem and ddbb

But If I send the second message with both contacts... I get none on mem or 
ddbb.
----------

One or more files have been attached.

More information can be found at the following URL:
https://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=351#comment1116

You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray 
bugtracking system.  If you did not expect this message or don't want to 
receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL 
shown above.

_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

Reply via email to