Hello,
indeed, in the source code t_reply() throws an error if used from branch
route, but sl_send_reply() is fine. Given that send_reply() is a wrapper
around the two, the code needs to be reviewed to see why t_reply() is
not allowed in branch route and find a solution for it.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/14/13 7:52 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
according to sl readme, send_reply() can be called from branch route.
however, when i tried with recent master i got:
Oct 14 08:47:34 rautu /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[11203]: : tm [tm.c:1342]:
w_t_reply(): BUG: w_t_reply entered in unsupported mode
Oct 14 08:47:34 rautu /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[11203]: ERROR: sl [sl.c:277]:
send_reply(): failed to reply stateful (tm)
is this a bug in code or readme?
-- juha
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28; Miami, Nov 18-20, 2013
- more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
