Richard Fuchs writes: > Yes I understand, but there's still a few different options to consider > in this case. > > Should it always add itself as relay candidate? Or only if there are > other ICE candidates already present?
in my opinion, always, and there should be option to replace existing ones. > Should it still replace the endpoint info in m= and c= lines? Or only if > it adds itself as host candidate? i'm not sure about that because i don't know ice well enough. if both parties support ice, do they care what is on those lines or do they only look at candidate ips/ports? if they don't care, then i guess it is ok to replace endpoint info on c and m lines. perhaps someone who knows ice well can comment. -- juha _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
