> On 05 Apr 2016, at 15:22, Alekzander Spiridonov <[email protected]> wrote: > > No need to map whatever id is to a number. Let's say data is maintained by > other sub-systems, so with current implementation either these sub-sys's have > to work with digit id's only or K have to have some sort of mapping. > Both options are not actually flexible. > > Although I do understand that use of int id's was kind of an > "over-optimization" =) Well, at start we only had numeric route-names, but we changed that. Any source code to fix this in dispatcher would be welcome!
Cheers, /O > > 2016-04-05 16:06 GMT+03:00 Olle E. Johansson <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > > On 05 Apr 2016, at 12:39, Alekzander Spiridonov <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Hi list, > > > > I was wondering if any work is in progress making dispatcher operate with > > non-numeric pool id's? Plans or todo's? Or may be some successor to replace > > dispatcher? > > Not that I’m aware of. > > Curious - what would be the benefit? Is there something you can’t easily do > today that would work with non-numeric ID’s? > > /O > _______________________________________________ > sr-dev mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev > <http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Alekzander Spiridonov > _______________________________________________ > sr-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
_______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
