On 15.04.17 08:30, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > >> I haven't used this table myself, it's coming from SER branch, but I >> guess the unique constraint is for being sure there are no duplicated >> values for the same did/name tuple, but more records with same did and >> name. > lookup_domain() adds attributes associated with did to AVPs. Sure there > can be more than one AVP with the same name. Therefore I suggest > removing name and value from the index. > I am fine to drop this unique constraint if nobody else has a reason to keep it and eventually add some normal indexes that could help when loading/updating records in database.
Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
