On 19.07.17 11:00, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > >> OK, so it is creating a new branch structure. That could explain why the >> branch flags from previous INVITE are not there. If it is only the >> branch flags missing (and the headers changes are already propagated), I >> expect to be an easy patch. I will look into it very soon if nobody else >> does it meanwhile. > I did more checking and looks like only branch flags are gone. In > addition to adding headers and setting branch flags, branch route adds > record-route params using add_rr_param calls and also those params are > preserved in the second INVITE. > Sounded rather simple, so I did a quick search in the code and just pushed a patch for it -- very small, but hopefully it fixes this. If all tests are fine for you, then you can backport as needed to stable branches.
Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
