does it make sense for Kamailio to create a connection if a client behind NAT has lost the connection? because It will almost always fail. It does make sense for IPv6 but not in IPv4 networks.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <[email protected] > wrote: > Ohh, misinterpreted tcp_no_connect=no is tcp_no_connect=0, which is the > default. > > My other remark related to user location was for the case of > tcp_no_connect=yes, which I thought is what was meant initially. > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 27.07.17 13:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > Hello, > > do you have tcp_no_connect=no in your config? Because I think the default > value is 0. > > It is useful when you have client behind the nat that closed the > connection, but the contact record is still valid in location table. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 27.07.17 13:09, Vik Killa wrote: > > I'm trying to understand the scenario when `tcp_no_connect` should ever be > set to `no`. > Kamailio comes with `tcp_no_connect=no` by default which means it will try > (and seemingly always fail) to create an outbound tcp connection when a > UAC's tcp connection is lost. This in-turn could start building up the tcp > write queue and can be disastrous at scale. > So why would this setting (`tcp_no_connect=no`) ever be useful? > Thanks > > > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing > [email protected]https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierlawww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com > Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com > > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierlawww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com > Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com > >
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
