Daniel, thanks for advice. I will try with janssonrpcc. Regards Adam
2017-09-18 9:31 GMT+02:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com>: > Hello, > > afaik, janssonrpcc module is supposed to be a better alternative to > jsonrpcc, just in case you want to try it. > > Back to jsonrpcc and the logs, it appears that there is a crash: > 0(921) ALERT: <core> [main.c:740]: handle_sigs(): child process 929 > exited by a signal 11 > 0(921) ALERT: <core> [main.c:743]: handle_sigs(): core was generated > > Can you locate the coredumo file and get the bactrace ('bt full') out of > it with gdb? > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 14.09.17 19:53, Adam Kuśmirek wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a problem with jsonrpcc module. > > OS is Debian Jessie. I tried with packeged kamailio 4.4 and compiled > kamailio 5.0. > > Kamailio starts properly. Routing block is very simple: > > route { > jsonrpc_request("get_source", "{'ipv4': '$si', 'port': $sp}", "RESPONSE", > "ERROR", "$var(result)"); > exit; > } > > route[RESPONSE] { > xlog("Result received: $var(result)"); > } > > route[ERROR] { > xlog("Error received: $var(result)"); > } > > > If any message arrives, kamailio sends it to my rpc_server (netstring > encoded): > > > 106:{'id': 2, 'jsonrpc': '2.0', 'method': 'get_source', 'params': {'ipv4': > '10.20.121.231', 'port': 5060}}, > > My server decodes the message and immediately answers with netstring > encoded response: > > 47:{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": "200 OK", "id": 2}, > > At this moment kamailio logs errors and disconnects from rpc server: > > root@kamailio-test:/etc/kamailio# 4(925) DEBUG: <core> > [parser/msg_parser.c:595]: parse_msg(): SIP Request: > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:597]: parse_msg(): method: > <REGISTER> > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:599]: parse_msg(): uri: > <sip:kamailio.conpeek.com> > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:601]: parse_msg(): version: > <SIP/2.0> > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param(): Found > param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK1033201528>; state=16 > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2639]: parse_via(): end of > header reached, state=5 > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:486]: parse_headers(): Via > found, flags=2 > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:488]: parse_headers(): this is > the first via > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:178]: receive_msg(): After parse_msg... > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:221]: receive_msg(): preparing to run > routing scripts... > 4(925) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1312]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg > id=1 , global msg id=0 , T on entrance=0xffffffffffffffff > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:864]: parse_addr_spec(): > end of header reached, state=10 > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:171]: get_hdr_field(): <To> > [40]; uri=[sip:1...@kamailio.conpeek.com] > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:172]: get_hdr_field(): to body > ["1000" <sip:1...@kamailio.conpeek.com> > ] > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:152]: get_hdr_field(): cseq > <CSeq>: <1> <REGISTER> > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:183]: get_hdr_field(): > content_length=0 > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:89]: get_hdr_field(): found end > of header > 4(925) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:466]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: > start searching: hash=43020, isACK=0 > 4(925) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:424]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 > transaction matching failed > 4(925) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:648]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: > t_lookup_request: no transaction found > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): MD5 calculated: > 920bfe28c581e1bf18554e3a9b234ceb > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:631]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list > (nil) > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:631]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list > (nil) > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:631]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list > (nil) > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:631]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list > (nil) > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:631]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list > (nil) > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:631]: destroy_avp_list(): destroying list > (nil) > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [xavp.c:446]: xavp_destroy_list(): destroying xavp > list (nil) > 4(925) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:318]: receive_msg(): cleaning up > *0(921) ALERT: <core> [main.c:740]: handle_sigs(): child process 929 > exited by a signal 11* > * 0(921) ALERT: <core> [main.c:743]: handle_sigs(): core was generated* > 0(921) INFO: <core> [main.c:755]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to > SIGCHLD > 0(921) DEBUG: <core> [main.c:757]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to > SIGCHLD > 7(928) INFO: <core> [main.c:810]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received > 6(927) INFO: <core> [main.c:810]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received > 5(926) INFO: <core> [main.c:810]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received > 4(925) INFO: <core> [main.c:810]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received > 3(924) INFO: <core> [main.c:810]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received > 2(923) INFO: <core> [main.c:810]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received > 1(922) INFO: <core> [main.c:810]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received > 0(921) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:86]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown : start > 0(921) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:89]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown : > emptying hash table > 0(921) DEBUG: tm [h_table.c:127]: free_cell_helper(): freeing transaction > 0x7fb99a822350 from h_table.c:449 > 0(921) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:91]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown : > removing semaphores > 0(921) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:93]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown : > destroying tmcb lists > 0(921) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:96]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown : done > 0(921) INFO: <core> [sctp_core.c:53]: sctp_core_destroy(): SCTP API not > initialized > 0(921) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm.c:174]: shm_core_lock_destroy(): destroying > the shared memory lock > 0(921) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm.c:266]: shm_destroy_manager(): destroying > memory manager: f_malloc > 0(921) DEBUG: <core> [mem/pkg.c:89]: pkg_destroy_manager(): destroying > memory manager: f_malloc > > The problem occures also if rpc server does not reply, i think when trying > to start ERROR route. > > If I try with jsonrpc_notification, everything is OK. > > > Any help ? > > Regards Adam > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing > Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierlawww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com > Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com > >
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users