Just in continue of the discussion forund in the RFC3261 12.1.2 (UAC behaivor) this:
The route set MUST be set to the list of URIs in the Record-Route header field from the response, taken in reverse order and preserving all URI parameters. If no Record-Route header field is present in the response, the route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route set for future requests in this dialog. The remote target MUST be set to the URI from the Contact header field of the response. 2018-07-01 11:48 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <[email protected]>: > Hm... Nice guess > I will try to check it > Thank you so much for clarify these things Alex! > > 2018-07-01 11:35 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov <[email protected]>: > >> On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 11:27:36AM +0300, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: >> >> > So FS in this case ignores single route header and sends request to the >> > Provider Contact.... >> >> If so, that's wrong. >> >> I suppose it's possible that it matches the next hop based on IP address >> alone and not port, but that's radioactively incorrect. >> >> -- >> Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC >> >> Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) >> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >> [email protected] >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> > >
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
