Anyway thank you so much for your responses I really appreciate your time and your help here
2018-07-02 10:42 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <[email protected]>: > Yep this clear for me from the start. > > For me for now not clear question abot direct connect for now. > > 2018-07-02 10:00 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov <[email protected]>: > >> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 09:59:12AM +0300, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: >> >> > That was my point also... >> > But they sent me lint to rfc3261 12.1.2 and that confused me >> > >> > So just for resume: >> > >> > So am I right if I say that in case If provider receives INVITE with >> > Record-Route from my side (myProxy) >> > Provider should care about it's own Record-Route and it should have uri >> > where myProxy should sent ACK to instead of using Contact in thi case >> > >> > In case direct conntect UAC -> Provider I still need to use Contact >> field >> > as URI to send ACK to that explained on the 12.1.2 of rfc3261? >> >> If the provider sent you a Record-Route of their own in addition to any >> that you have placed there, your UAC must still follow it when >> contacting them for in-dialog requests. >> >> -- >> Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC >> >> Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) >> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >> [email protected] >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> > >
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
