Hi Joel the Via's and Record routes is due to IMS structure, but it doesn't affect the concept as i test it with a normal sip Proxy
Proxy IP : 94.252.181.93 : 5050 RTP Engine : 94.252.181.49 I-cscf : 10.192.129.134 s-cscf :10.192.129.134 Actually i'm using what Mr Carsten introduce for IMS On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 8:33 PM Joel Serrano <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Amar, > > I had a quick look and I see a lot of via/route headers, I will look > properly later today, can you give me some details on what IP is what > in those traces for when I check them later? > > Also, are you using a kamailio config based on vanilla config > (specially regarding NAT handling and Contact/SDP updates/rewrites)? > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Amar Tinawi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > it's Kamailio for signaling with RTPengine for media (also the RTP engine > > has public IP) > > > > any call to reach the user behind the CGNAT will fail because of the 200 > OK > > msg not reaching the Proxy somehow (i checked, the massage is generated > in > > the client) > > and any call initiated by the CGNAT client succeeded > > > > would you please check the attached > > many thanks > > > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 6:00 AM Joel Serrano <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> It would definitely be useful to see sip traces of the different > scenarios > >> to try and find what the problem is. > >> > >> Can you give some details of what your setup looks like? Is kamailio > >> acting as a signaling proxy only or is it also handling RTP with > >> rtpengine/rtpproxy? > >> > >> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 13:30 Amar Tinawi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Thanks Joel For reply > >>> > >>> when any user (Not Nated or behind Normal NAT) is trying to reach a > >>> client behind CGNAT, the INVITE delivered and the client is start to > >>> ringing, but when answering, the answer is not delivered to the proxy, > so > >>> not delivered to the calling client result to the call started in the > >>> CGNATED client and still in establishing in the calling one. > >>> > >>> The call is established successfully when the CGNATED send the INVITE > to > >>> Not Nated client and two way audio. > >>> > >>> CGNATED to CGNATED not working as well . > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 7:57 PM Joel Serrano <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Also, if the client is not behind CGNAT do you get the Ringing from > >>>> called party? > >>>> > >>>> Is called party the same in both cases? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 09:54 Joel Serrano <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Can you send the INVITE that proxy sends to called party? > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 02:05 Amar Tinawi <[email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hello > >>>>>> Although my question it's not related to Kamailio directly, but i > >>>>>> think someone could help in this strange behavior > >>>>>> > >>>>>> in our tests, we have some clients under private networks, where the > >>>>>> provider of those networks implements CGNAT (NAT444) for it's > customers to > >>>>>> reach internet > >>>>>> (Client Private IP) --->(Home router: Private to Private NAT)--->(FW > >>>>>> with CGNAT)---------------------------->(Kamailio Proxy Public IP) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Registration is performing fine, but making calls from this client > had > >>>>>> strange problem as follow: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Client -------------INVITE--------------> Proxy > >>>>>> Proxy -------------Trying---------------->Client > >>>>>> Proxy--------------INVITE---------> Called Party > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The called party should send Ringing msg, but the massage get lost > >>>>>> somewhere and didn't reach to the Proxy. Although all the IP's in > sip > >>>>>> massages are public > >>>>>> i tried with STUN/TURN and NAThelper module solutions, but didn't > help > >>>>>> > >>>>>> is there any way to slove CGNAT with SIP in Kamailio? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks in Advance > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > > [email protected] > > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > [email protected] > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
