> On 24 Sep 2018, at 23:04, Alex Balashov <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:46:44PM +0100, Ben Hood wrote: > >> I was trying (as a temporary hack) to mangle this to become >> >> Contact: <sip:[email protected] >> <sip:[email protected]>> > > But that's not grammatically valid…
You are absolutely correct, but I don’t think that is what I wrote (might be a typo from me?). I was trying to produce: Contact: <sip:[email protected]> Which I have now achieved by adding msg_apply_changes(); after the invocation of subst_hf(). Seems that the SIP buffer needs to be explicitly finalised before transport. However, my theory about patching the Contact header to make the remote system happy is wrong - the 200 OK is still not ACK’ed. So I need to look into the NAT’ing a bit more to see what might be going on - but this is a different question to how to use subst_hf(). Many thanks for helping me out with this, very much appreciated. _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
