Hello, Any ideas about this header manipulation?
Cheers, Olli pe 14. jouluk. 2018 klo 12.31 Olli Attila (attio...@gmail.com) kirjoitti: > > Hello, > > We have a call case where our softswitch replies to in-dialog > re-invite with "SIP 491 Request pending". This happens when a customer > sip device is trying to re-invite the session too fast even though the > softswitch is still processing the earlier request. Kamailio operates > between this customer device and the softswitch. > > The softswitch is adding a P-Charging-Vector header to this SIP 491 > reply which we want to drop (remove_hf...) from the reply when we > route the SIP 491 message back to the customers device. > > I tried to drop this inside in-dialog failure route but it seems that > Kamailio forwards the orginal 491 message statelessly to customer and > the header still extists there eventhough failure route has deleted > it. I guess this modification should be done in a sateful manner for > Kamailio to actually write the changes to the outgoing reply towards > the customer device. > > Any suggestions how the 491 reply could be edited and then forwarded > onwards to the customer device? > > Cheers, > --Olli -- "Logic is the art of going wrong with confidence." _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
