Hello Henning, Correctly understood, this is exactly what I've experienced (kamailio 5.2.0) I'll absolutely make a new lab-test and strace !
Thanks for your suggestion! Best regards Il giorno sab 26 gen 2019 alle ore 19:05 Henning Westerholt <[email protected]> ha scritto: > Am Samstag, 26. Januar 2019, 19:00:32 CET schrieb * Paolo Visintin - > > I'm using DMQ in order to share : > > - htable > > - usrloc > > > > for usrloc seems everything working as expected. > > > > on htable I have noticed, after some stresstest made with sipp (25 cps / > > 600 concurrent calls) that one of the nodes (or sometimes both) eat a lot > > of cpu (300%) after stresstest ended [all processes idle except f4 dmq > > handlers]; I tried also to change some parameters on dmq module like > > worker_usleep with no changes at all. > > Hello Paolo, > > just commenting on the first issue: > > So I understood you correctly, after the stress-test you observe a not > ending > CPU load on the Kamailio server, even without load? > > Maybe you can have a look on the CPU consuming processes by attaching e.g. > "strace" to them at the next occasion, to see what they are doing. > > Best regards, > > Henning > > > At last, using kamailio in a kubernetes system I have several kamailio > > instances that pops-up and then tiers down with different ips; for this > > reason dmq seems not able to delete peers, adding, for every defunct > node a > > warning like this : > > router-3 17(34) ERROR: dmq [notification_peer.c:599]: > > notification_resp_callback_f(): deleting server > > sip:172.28.1.211:5062;status=active > > because of failed request > > router-1 router-sr 17(33) ERROR: dmq [notification_peer.c:599]: > > notification_resp_callback_f(): deleting server > > sip:172.28.1.213:5062;status=active > > because of failed request > > > > Il giorno sab 26 gen 2019 alle ore 01:43 Alex Balashov < > > > > [email protected]> ha scritto: > > > I think the realistic answer is that it's getting to be that way. I > > > think DMQ is now the recommended way to share usrloc and htable across > > > multiple hosts. DMQ+dialog is still a work in progress. Not sure about > > > DMQ+some other new stuff. > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 04:21:43PM +0000, Canuck . wrote: > > > > Before DMQ there were other ways to do similar things. Is DMQ now > > > > considered the best way? Assuming I am using recent stable? > > > > > > > > Are there any good guides on clustering Kamailio? I am not finding a > > > > lot of good info on that subject. Specifically, for multi datacenter > > > > active active where things like floating IP's and keepalived are not > > > > really an option. > > -- > Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ > Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services > Kamailio security assessment - https://skalatan.de/de/assessment >
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
