Today there was another report with a backtrace like the one you reported, so I try to figure out if there are any common aspects between the two systems.
Can you tell what linux distro and version was running in your case? Also, can you give the output for: uname -a Cheers, Daniel On 14.02.19 08:54, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > >> However, that had invalid access to transaction pointer. In this case, >> accessing transaction is ok, by setting a variable to the address of one >> of its fields, but then the variable becomes NULL, which is not possible >> unless the stack got corrupted/overwritten. However, from the moment of >> setting the variable till the moment of the crash, there are no other >> set or copy operations, therefore nothing that I can relate to >> kamailio's c code. Maybe it happens another time and the backtrace will >> be different. > I agree, Juha -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 4-6, 2019 in Berlin; Mar 25-27, 2019, in Washington, DC, USA -- www.asipto.com _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
