What if you do: remove_hf(“Record-Route”);
? — Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors. > On Apr 27, 2019, at 7:00 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi ppl, > > After a branch route fails, I need to re-evaluate the next destination and > adjust RR parameters, if need be, like for example adjust the nat=yes|priv. > > failure_route[MANAGE_PSTN_FAILURE] { > ... > remove_record_route(); > record_route(); > route(NATMANAGE); > ... > route(RELAY); > } > > The result is that the new branch is stripped of "Record-Route: <sip:MYIP>", > but the params remained. Moreover, record_route hasn't been re-added as > instructed in the failure route. > > Request headers of the initial branch that will eventually timeout and fail: > > 2019/04/27 18:29:18.034992 10.22.0.1:5060 -> 10.22.0.100:5060 > > > > INVITE sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0 > > > > Record-Route: <sip:10.22.0.1;r2=on;lr=on;did=9e2.3dd2;nat=priv> > Record-Route: <sip:65.XX.XX.1;r2=on;lr=on;did=9e2.3dd2;nat=priv> > > New request branch after failure: > > 2019/04/27 18:29:19.538292 65.XX.XXX.1:5060 -> 65.XX.XX.2:5060 > INVITE sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0 > ;lr=on;did=9e2.3dd2;nat=priv> > > > kamailio -v > version: kamailio 5.1.6 (x86_64/linux) 7d1964 > > Much obliged. > --Sergiu > > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > [email protected] > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
