Hello again, I've just noticed that if new branch is created after using *t_suspend* and *t_continue*, branch flag can not be used. Not sure if it can not be set or checked. Doues anyone know about potential problems with such configuration?
Thanks! вт, 28 трав. 2019 о 19:43 Володимир Іванець <[email protected]> пише: > Hello Alex, > > Thank you for the clarification. Now I understand this behavior. > > пт, 24 трав. 2019 о 22:07 Alex Balashov <[email protected]> пише: > >> Branches are a creature of transactions. It follows that “branch flags” >> are transaction-persistent flags at the branch level, rather than scoped to >> the transaction as a whole. >> >> ACKs constitute a separate transaction. >> >> — >> Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors. >> >> On May 24, 2019, at 2:45 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Then.. I don't know, lol >> >> But the fact that ACKs belong or not to even different transactions >> (depending on whether positive or negative reply) must be playing a role >> here. >> >> Good luck. >> >> On Fri, May 24, 2019, 12:11 PM Володимир Іванець, < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hello Sergiu, >>> >>> We allow multiple contacts to register on single account. They can have >>> different properties. On step 1 I'm looking for something specific which >>> can be different for different contacts. If I understood correctly >>> *setbflag* and *isbflagset* can set and check flags for different >>> branches independently. >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> пт, 24 трав. 2019 о 18:14 Sergiu Pojoga <[email protected]> пише: >>> >>>> I might be wrong, but isn't ACK part of a transaction? If so, you'd >>>> need to use *setflag*/*isflagset* >>>> >>>> Cheers. >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:03 AM Володимир Іванець < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello everyone! >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure if I correctly understood the description of functions >>>>> *isbflagset* and *isbflagset* so once again I'm asking for help :) >>>>> >>>>> Here is what I do: >>>>> 1. Asterisk sends INVITE to Kamailio. Kamailio performs lookup of >>>>> available contacts and then few checks in branch_route. I'm adding >>>>> *setbflag("17", >>>>> $T_branch_idx);* there. >>>>> 2. Later in route[NATMANAGE] I added *if (isbflagset("17", >>>>> $T_branch_idx)) {* and additional logic. *isbflagset* results in >>>>> *true* (for same INVITE). >>>>> 3. Finally one of UACs responds with 200 OK. Asterisk generates ACK >>>>> packet that gets in route[NATMANAGE]. *isbflagset* results in *false*. >>>>> >>>>> So my question is: shouldn't *isbflagset* be *true* for ACK too since >>>>> it's the same branch or I interpreted these fenctions incorrectly? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks a lot! >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >> [email protected] >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >> [email protected] >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
