The timeout is generated locally, so no sip response is available from the network, the event route being executed with a faked request, having headers not related to that call -- as I said in the previous response, use $dlg(...) var:
- https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/pseudovariables#dlg_attr Cheers, Daniel On 12.06.19 13:45, Igor Olhovskiy wrote: > Ok. More details. > > I have INVITE and on fr_inv_timer expiry I'm catching timeout in > failure_route, but not within dialog:failed. > Yes, INVITE is not completing with 200 from other side, but it's > actually not completing with any request from other side at all. It's > terminated internally by Kamailio. > And on dialog:failure in this case I see a strange OPTIONS packet. > > Regards, Igor > On Jun 12, 2019, 12:36 +0300, Daniel-Constantin Mierla > <[email protected]>, wrote: >> >> Can you be more specific about: "I can't get which dialog failed >> exactly"? >> >> What do you want to get? Which attribute/value related to dialog? >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 12.06.19 10:57, Igor Olhovskiy wrote: >>> Yes, sorry, `dialog:failed` exactly. >>> >>> Issue I found is quite strange. Schema of testing is >>> >>> A calling B through Kamailio. B is not answering, jut keep sending 180. >>> On dialog:failed I have this code: >>> >>> event_route[dialog:failed] { >>> xlog("L_ALERT", '[DIALOG:FAILED] "req":"$rm", "cs":"$cs", >>> "dst":"$du", "from":"$fU", "to":"$tU", "cid":"$ci", "si":"$si", >>> "sp":"$sp", "kts":$TV(Sn)' + "\n"); >>> } >>> Quite simple. But when actual dialog failed on fr_inv_timer excite, >>> in logs I have >>> ALERT: <script>: [DIALOG:FAILED] "req":"OPTIONS", "cs":"1", >>> "dst":"<null>", "from":"you", "to":"you", "cid":"123", >>> "si":"1.0.0.127", "sp":"5060", "kts":1560329373.947588 >>> And I can't get which dialog failed exactly. But on the other hand, >>> I can catch it on failure_route on t_branch_timeout() >>> That was a question actually. Cause on call reject (with 5xx or 6xx) >>> or similar I have correct dialog:failed event. >>> >>> Regards, Igor >>> On Jun 11, 2019, 13:23 +0300, Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>> <[email protected]>, wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> On 10.06.19 13:35, Igor Olhovskiy wrote: >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> Just to confirm, is event route [dialog:end] not called on >>>>> fr_inv_timer expiry? >>>>> Cause it's called on call busy (486) and reject (whatever 6xx). So, >>>>> what's the idea of not calling it on timeout? Or I'm missing >>>>> something? >>>>> >>>>> Kamailio 5.2 >>>> >>>> if the INVITE does not get 200ok, then another event route is executed: >>>> >>>> - >>>> https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/dialog.html#idm1039307844 >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com >>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>>> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com >> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
