Hello Thomas, In our experience I can confirm the same issue (we are using topos with redis like you and we are econtiering some restrictions when dealing with some carriers) . In my opinion this could be an interesting improvement that could be also set using a modparam, for example .
Cheers, Paolo Il giorno mar 25 giu 2019 alle 15:06 Thomas Weber <[email protected]> ha scritto: > Hello, > > we're using topos/redis since some time and it's working quite well for > most situations. It's used to route asterisk traffic to sip providers. > Some providers, however, are validating the contact header strictly > against i.e. the accounts username and so we have to disable topos by using > event_route[topos:msg-sending]. > > Now i'm wondering if it would be useful to other people to add a mode to > topos where the topos uid is not forwarded as contact username but instead > added as a contact uri param. > So instead of e.g. Contact: > <sip:[email protected]:5060;transport=tcp> > it would use Contact: <sip:[email protected] > :5060;transport=tcp;line=btpsh-5abcdef5-374-1>. > > What do you think? Would it make sense? Is it a lot of effort? > > > Cheers, > > Thomas > > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > [email protected] > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > -- *Paolo Visintin* *CTO* evosip.cloud [image: Risultati immagini per evosip]
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
