Greetings,
This is a repeated problem, but i have more info now. Please help
understand if there is a problem on my code or if there is any kind of
Kamailio bug.
On the first INVITE of every call i apply uac_replace_from() and
uac_replace_to() in order to normalize numeration. I have the restore_mode
set as "auto".
The original numeration is :
To : 351250000000
From : 351211455000
The INVITE is sent to the client with To and From like this and with the
Record-Route headers (Kamailio has 2 Ips and inserts 2 Record-Routes)
containing vsf and vst parameters to help the future restores :
To: <sip:+351250000000@111.111.111.111>
From: <sip:+351211455000@111.111.111.111
>;tag=BD583030373631320511EAE6
Record-Route:
<sip:111.111.111.111;r2=on;lr;ftag=BD583030373631320511EAE6;tbk_i=2_2_Y;tbk_o=128_11_Y;vsf=AAAAABgGBAMDAAUBBQAJCnNyAwMcHwIdHQsWHwUMOA--;vst=AAAAABgGBAMHDQgJDQECA3RyAwMcHwIdGgQeHAIFOQ--;did=18e.5d62>
Record-Route:
<sip:111.111.111.111;r2=on;lr;ftag=BD583030373631320511EAE6;tbk_i=2_2_Y;tbk_o=128_11_Y;vsf=AAAAABgGBAMDAAUBBQAJCnNyAwMcHwIdHQsWHwUMOA--;vst=AAAAABgGBAMHDQgJDQECA3RyAwMcHwIdGgQeHAIFOQ--;did=18e.5d62>
My client, upon receiving the INVITE, also does some changes in the
numeration and sends a 183 reply with the following headers :
Record-Route:
<sip:111.111.111.111;r2=on;lr;ftag=BD583030373631320511EAE6;tbk_i=2_2_Y;tbk_o=128_11_Y;vsf=AAAAABgGBAMDAAUBBQAJCnNyAwMcHwIdHQsWHwUMOA--;vst=AAAAABgGBAMHDQgJDQECA3RyAwMcHwIdGgQeHAIFOQ--;did=18e.5d62>
Record-Route:
<sip:111.111.111.111;r2=on;lr;ftag=BD583030373631320511EAE6;tbk_i=2_2_Y;tbk_o=128_11_Y;vsf=AAAAABgGBAMDAAUBBQAJCnNyAwMcHwIdHQsWHwUMOA--;vst=AAAAABgGBAMHDQgJDQECA3RyAwMcHwIdGgQeHAIFOQ--;did=18e.5d62>
From: "+351211455000" <sip:I2116446I_500@111.111.111.111
>;tag=BD583030373631320511EAE6
To: <sip:+351250000000@111.111.111.111>;tag=as3e46f684
After Kamailio processes the reply, To and
>From are restored to it's original values and the reply is relayed :
From: <sip:351211455000@111.111.111.111
>;tag=BD583030373631320511EAE6
To: <sip:351250000000@111.111.111.111>;tag=as3e46f684
Here, the restore works perfectly.
By the end of the call the client sends me a BYE request with Route, From
and To like this :
Route:
<sip:111.111.111.111;r2=on;lr;ftag=BD583030373631320511EAE6;tbk_i=2_2_Y;tbk_o=128_11_Y;vsf=AAAAABgGBAMDAAUBBQAJCnNyAwMcHwIdHQsWHwUMOA--;vst=AAAAABgGBAMHDQgJDQECA3RyAwMcHwIdGgQeHAIFOQ--;did=18e.5d62>,<sip:212.13.40.205;r2=on;lr;ftag=BD583030373631320511EAE6;tbk_i=2_2_Y;tbk_o=128_11_Y;vsf=AAAAABgGBAMDAAUBBQAJCnNyAwMcHwIdHQsWHwUMOA--;vst=AAAAABgGBAMHDQgJDQECA3RyAwMcHwIdGgQeHAIFOQ--;did=18e.5d62>
From: <sip:+351250000000@111.111.111.111
>;tag=as3e46f684
To: "+351211455000" <sip:I2116446I_500@111.111.111.111
>;tag=BD583030373631320511EAE6
Here, the difference between 183 and BYE
seems to be only in the Route\Record-Route are built (2 Headers or one
header with 2 uri).
Now, there are a couple of problems relaying
the BYE that seem to me to be related to auto replace.
This BYE message isn't logged on the
onsend-route and it logs a couple of errors :
ERROR: <core>
[core/parser/msg_parser.c:164]: get_hdr_field(): bad to header
ERROR: <core>
[core/parser/msg_parser.c:337]: parse_headers(): bad header field [To:
"+351211455000"
<sip:Q4525417L_<:C212.13.38.148>;tag=3DC130303736313205201F18#015#012Call-ID:
020FAAC7]
ERROR: dialog
[dlg_handlers.c:666]: pre_match_parse(): bad request or missing CALLID/TO
hdr :-/
ERROR: <core>
[core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:719]: parse_addr_spec(): unexpected char [<]
in status 6: ["+351211455000" <sip:Q4525417L_] .
Despite not being logged on onsend_route and
creating some errors, the BYE is still relayed like this :
From: <
sip:351250000000@111.111.111.111>;tag=as3e46f684
To: "+351211455000"
<sip:Q4525417L_<:C111.111.111.111>;tag=BD583030373631320511EAE6
This, naturally, generates a "400 Bad
Request" reply from the next equipment.
I've also logged the $tU values along the
code for BYE requests and it always logs the "I2116446I_500", so i don't
know if my code can be the cause of this.
A couple of questions and comments
- What can i do to better debug this issue?
I want to be sure if the problem comes from my code of if it is a Kamailio
issue. Right now i'm not sure where to look.
- Can a request be sent without passing on
onsend_route ? I have used this code to "catch" the BYE, which works for
other BYEs - if( $rm == "BYE") {xerr("On send : To User = $tU");}
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
