Hello, I removed KSR.x.exit() and I got same results for cpu usage and Recv-Q.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 3:56 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > can you remove the KSR.x.exit() and test again? It will be the same effect > from sip routing point of view, just to see what is the result. > > Because Lua 'exit' cannot be used, KSR.x.exit() is a workaround relying on > error/exception handling with string comparison that I did. > > However, overall KSR.x.exit() alone has an insignificant effect on a > production configuration, based on the tests I did for kamailio 5.2, you > can look for more at: > > - https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/kemi/performance-tests/5.2.x > > Cheers, > Daniel > On 12.11.19 21:28, GG GG wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > For lua example, it's just an error when writing my email... in my config > file I have KSR.x.exit(); > I have not tested a more complex config, but I'm curious about kemi > framework and how it works. So before anything else I made a simple test to > know the cpu overhead. > For this test, I noticed that the Recv-Q of kamailio remains high with > kemi/lua, and with the native one remains to 0, with children=1 of course. > Next step, is to use a more complex config file. > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 3:00 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla < > mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> is it really just 'exit' in the ksr_core_received()? Because that should >> shut down kamailio. >> >> Anyhow, practically with the examples here, you test the difference >> between looking up a function and doing exit in native kamailio.cfg and lua >> script, which is really marginal comparing with the rest of configuration >> file in a usual production deployment. Have you tested with a more complex >> set of actions/functions? >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> On 12.11.19 17:36, GG GG wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> I just made a simple test performance between native script and kemi/lua >> with the event_route[core:msg-received] callback. >> >> # lua script children=1 cpu.process=100% >> function ksr_core_received() >> exit; >> end >> >> # native script children=1 cpu.process=70% >> event_route[core:msg-received] { >> exit; >> } >> >> # tested with udp 5060, 1000 Mbits/sec >> iperf -c 127.0.0.1 -p 5060 -u -b1000m >> >> I don't know if it's normal and what we should expect from kemi, but I >> would like to share this with you. Maybe someone could confirm the >> performance difference. >> >> Have a good day ! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing >> Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- >> www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- >> www.kamailioworld.com >> >> -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- > www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- > www.kamailioworld.com > >
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users