Daniel,

I just did some tests the same way as Duarte’s and the parameter I think you 
mentioned ({uri.uparam}: “Return the value of user parameter”) does not work as 
expected:

URI sip:123456789;test=param;[email protected];user=phone
$(var(URI){uri. uparam}) = "phone"

URI sip:123456789;test=param;[email protected]
$(var(URI){uri. uparam}) = ""

Am I missing something?

--
Julien
De : sr-users <[email protected]> au nom de Duarte Rocha 
<[email protected]>
Répondre à : "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <[email protected]>
Date : lundi 18 novembre 2019 à 14:19
À : Daniel-Constantin Mierla <[email protected]>
Cc : "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <[email protected]>
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Problem with URI transformations

As far as i know, the URI transformations only provide the "user" parameter, 
not the user part parameters.

What i'm trying to do i build an object for Diversion and Contact. To do that 
i'm trying to parse the header and URI into it's elements.

URI Example : 
<sip:123456;parameter=hello;[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;kamailio=test>

Elements :
  User : 123456
  User Parameters : parameter=hello;parameter2=hey
  Domain : 1.1.1.1
  URI Parameters = kamailio=teste
To achieve this i'm using uri.user , uri.domain , uri.port and uri.params.

uri.user will normally return "123456;parameter=hello;parameter2=hey" and after 
that i mannually split the user and teh user params. However, in the event of a 
TEL_URI with user=phone on uri.params, "parameter=hello;parameter2=hey" won't 
be present in the uri.user.

It seems like i should be doing a special case for when user=phone is present. 
What do you think ?

A segunda, 18/11/2019, 12:29, Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> escreveu:

Hello,

check the URI transformation docs, iirc there is an option to get user 
parameters.

If not, can you give an example of what params you want to work with, likely 
you can get it with other transformations...

Cheers,
Daniel
On 18.11.19 13:13, Duarte Rocha wrote:
Greetings,

My issue was related to user part parameters being lost. I didn't know that the 
parse would work differently when user=phone was present. Thank you for 
pointing that out.

That being said, how should i proceed if i want to check user part parameters 
in this scenario? Like phone-context for example.

Best Regards

A sexta, 15/11/2019, 20:38, Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> escreveu:

Hello,

what did you expect to be? To be able to comment on the exact topic.

user=phone changes the structure of the URI in something similar to tel URI.

Cheers,
Daniel
On 15.11.19 17:51, Duarte Rocha wrote:
Greetings,

I'm trying to parse some URI info on Kamailio but i'm having some troubles the 
URI transformations.

Here i have two examples of URIS from which i'm trying to extract username(with 
user parameters included) and URI Parameters :
- sip:123456789;[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
- sip:123456789;[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;user=phone
In order to test this i made the following code :

$var(URI) = "sip:123456789;[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>";
xerr("DEBUG 1 : URI $var(URI)");
$var(User) = $(var(URI){uri.user});
$var(Parameters) = $(var(URI){uri.params});
xerr("DEBUG 1 : User = $var(User)");
xerr("DEBUG 1 : Parameters = $var(Parameters)");
$var(URI) = "sip:123456789;[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;user=phone";
xerr("DEBUG 2 : URI $var(URI)"); ;
$var(User) = $(var(URI){uri.user});
$var(Parameters) = $(var(URI){uri.params});
xerr("DEBUG 2 : User =  $var(User)");
xerr("DEBUG 2 : Parameters = $var(Parameters)");
The result is the following :
DEBUG 1 : URI sip:123456789;[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
DEBUG 1 : User = 123456789;test=param
DEBUG 1 : Parameters =

DEBUG 2 : URI sip:123456789;[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;user=phone
DEBUG 2 : User =  123456789
DEBUG 2 : Parameters = user=phone
If the URI has parameters, the User parameters won't be included in the User 
part.

Is this a bug or is it working as intended? I'm running Kamailio 5.2.0 .

Thank you for your time.

Best Regards,

Duarte Rocha



_______________________________________________

Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

--

Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>

www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- 
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>

Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- 
www.kamailioworld.com<http://www.kamailioworld.com>

--

Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>

www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- 
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>

Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- 
www.kamailioworld.com<http://www.kamailioworld.com>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
[email protected]
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to