Thank you Daniel, this was indeed misleading. Am 12.12.19 um 08:45 schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla: > Hello, > > it was supposed to be about sip message flags (the setflag() and > resetflag() operations) - I updated that paragraph to clarify it. Feel > free to add more or remove content to make it better. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 12.12.19 08:01, Juha Heinanen wrote: >> I noticed this in t_newtrans() README: >> >> Note that any flag operations (e.g. for accounting) after this >> function has been called will be ignored. You can use the the tmx >> module function t_flush_flags() to flush the altered flags to the >> already created transaction. >> >> The text is wrong. I have for ages set bflags after calliing >> t_newtrans() and the sets are NOT ignored. >> >> Here is an example: >> >> In route blocks: >> Dec 12 08:41:53 /usr/bin/sip-proxy[231131]: INFO: ********* called >> t_newtrans() >> Dec 12 08:41:53 /usr/bin/sip-proxy[231131]: INFO: ************ set bflag 9 >> >> In failure route block: >> Dec 12 08:41:58 /usr/bin/sip-proxy[231195]: INFO: ************ bflag 9 is set >> >> -- Juha >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >> [email protected] >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
