Hi Daniel, The process desc says: DMQ WORKER
Joel. On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:55 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <[email protected]> wrote: > Can you get the type of the process throwing the error? The pid is printed > in the log message and the type you can find in the description > corresponding to the pid in the output of: > > kamctl ps > > Cheers, > Daniel > On 24.02.20 20:42, Joel Serrano wrote: > > Ok so my findings so far: > > 1- db_mode=2 --> No errors. > 2- db_mode=1 --> The reported error. > 3- modparam("usrloc", "server_id_filter", 1) --> Irrelevant, errors happen > with or without it on db_mode=1. > > Anything else I can try in order to find out what is happening? My next > step was to enable mysql logs or capture traffic and see what exactly is > Kam sending... > > Let me know your thoughts. > > Thanks, > Joel. > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:26 AM Joel Serrano <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Henning, >> >> Every time I register, NodeA says OK, sends location by DMQ to NodeB, >> nodeB logs the error. >> >> I tried moving the VIP from NodeA to NodeB, and the error stops happening >> on NodeA, and starts happening on NodeB. >> >> I did not see this happening with db_mode=2, and I *think* it started >> happening when I enabled the server_id related params? I'm not 100% sure of >> this so I'm going to try some different combinations to see if I can narrow >> it down a little and provide more accurate details for you guys to find the >> issue. >> >> I'll report back shortly... >> >> Thanks! >> Joel. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:20 AM Henning Westerholt <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello Joel, >>> >>> >>> >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]: >>> db_use_table(): invalid parameter value >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:670]: >>> db_insert_ucontact(): sql use_table failed for: location >>> >>> >>> >>> So the table name seems to be ok - this function also log this error if >>> the DB connection handle is not initialized. But still the question why >>> this happens. >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> >>> >>> Henning >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ >>> >>> Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* sr-users <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Joel >>> Serrano >>> *Sent:* Monday, February 24, 2020 8:10 PM >>> *To:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla <[email protected]> >>> *Cc:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Database errors with usrloc db_mode=1 and >>> dmq_usrloc >>> >>> >>> >>> Hello Daniel, >>> >>> >>> >>> I built from master and re-tested, debug log: >>> >>> >>> >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: <core> >>> [core/socket_info.c:635]: grep_sock_info(): checking if port 5060 >>> (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:423]: usrloc_dmq_execute_action(): Received DMQ_UPDATE. >>> Update contact info... >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:75]: >>> add_contact(): aor: 1000107 >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:76]: >>> add_contact(): ci->ruid: uloc-2-5e507d6a-1bd5-3 >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:77]: >>> add_contact(): aorhash: 928379112 >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:115]: add_contact(): '1000107' Not found in usrloc >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:117]: add_contact(): Insert record >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: usrloc [ul_callback.h:83]: >>> run_ul_callbacks(): contact=0x7f3a8cfdf170, callback type 1/15, id 0 entered >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:800]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Callback from usrloc with type=1 >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:826]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Contact received from DMQ... skip >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]: >>> db_use_table(): invalid parameter value >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:670]: >>> db_insert_ucontact(): sql use_table failed for: location >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: ERROR: usrloc [urecord.c:598]: >>> insert_ucontact(): failed to insert in database >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:121]: add_contact(): Insert ucontact >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:124]: add_contact(): Release record >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:126]: add_contact(): Unlock udomain >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: sl [sl.c:305]: send_reply(): >>> reply in stateless mode (sl) >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: <core> >>> [core/msg_translator.c:161]: check_via_address(): (10.2.1.181, 10.2.1.181, >>> 0) >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dialog [dlg_cseq.c:116]: >>> dlg_cseq_prepare_new_msg(): prepare new msg for cseq update operations >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: <core> >>> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:620]: parse_msg(): SIP Reply (status): >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: <core> >>> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:622]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: <core> >>> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:624]: parse_msg(): status: <200> >>> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: <core> >>> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:626]: parse_msg(): reason: <OK> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Joel. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 1:36 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> the error message: >>> >>> Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]: >>> db_use_table(): invalid parameter value >>> >>> Is printed if the database table name is not given as parameter (eg, >>> null or empty). I pushed a patch to usrloc to print the table in the log >>> message, can you try with latest master (or patch from next commit) and >>> send again the log messages? >>> >>> * >>> https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/3843ae18599bfc1806ccb62df44bbc8ad41d60dd >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Daniel >>> >>> On 21.02.20 22:40, Joel Serrano wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> >>> I have a setup with 2 kamailio in active/idle, locations are shared via >>> dmq_usrloc, but database is also used as a cache where other systems can >>> access and query "real-time" data. >>> >>> >>> >>> The config we have is: >>> >>> >>> >>> # ----- usrloc params ----- >>> modparam("usrloc", "db_url", DBURL) >>> modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 1) >>> modparam("usrloc", "db_load", 0) >>> modparam("usrloc", "db_insert_update", 1) >>> modparam("usrloc", "db_timer_clean", 1) >>> modparam("usrloc", "server_id_filter", 1) >>> modparam("usrloc", "timer_procs", 2) >>> modparam("usrloc", "timer_interval", 60) >>> >>> >>> >>> # ----- dmq_usrloc params ----- >>> modparam("dmq_usrloc", "enable", 1) >>> modparam("dmq_usrloc", "sync", 1) >>> modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_msg_contacts", 50) # 50 contacts / message >>> modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_size", 10000) # 10000 contacts / >>> batch >>> modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_usleep", 500000) # one batch every 500ms >>> >>> >>> >>> With this setup, we assume: >>> >>> >>> >>> 1- almost real-time updated location info in the database. >>> >>> 2- as long as one of the two Kam is up, location information will not be >>> lost (as they will sync with each other via DMQ) >>> >>> 3- if both servers go down, locations are lost (as they will not reload >>> from database on startup). >>> >>> >>> >>> Our tests work well with the above config, with one exception, on the >>> idle node, we see a lot of (only happens on the node receiving location via >>> dmq): >>> >>> >>> >>> Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]: >>> db_use_table(): invalid parameter value >>> Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:1136]: >>> db_update_ucontact_ruid(): sql use_table failed >>> Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:1657]: >>> update_contact_db(): failed to update database >>> >>> >>> >>> I added debug logs to see if I could understand the reason: >>> >>> >>> >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:478]: usrloc_dmq_handle_msg(): dmq message received from >>> sip:[email protected]:5050 >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:423]: usrloc_dmq_execute_action(): Received DMQ_UPDATE. >>> Update contact info... >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:75]: add_contact(): aor: 1063362 >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:76]: add_contact(): ci->ruid: uloc-1-5e502cd3-5629-1 >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:77]: add_contact(): aorhash: 928261667 >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:115]: add_contact(): '1063362' Not found in usrloc >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:117]: add_contact(): Insert record >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: usrloc [ul_callback.h:83]: >>> run_ul_callbacks(): contact=0x7fe41ff41f40, callback type 1/15, id 0 entered >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:800]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Callback from usrloc with type=1 >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:826]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Contact received from DMQ... skip >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]: >>> db_use_table(): invalid parameter value >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:669]: >>> db_insert_ucontact(): sql use_table failed >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: ERROR: usrloc [urecord.c:598]: >>> insert_ucontact(): failed to insert in database >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:121]: add_contact(): Insert ucontact >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:124]: add_contact(): Release record >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc >>> [usrloc_sync.c:126]: add_contact(): Unlock udomain >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: sl [sl.c:305]: send_reply(): >>> reply in stateless mode (sl) >>> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: <core> >>> [core/msg_translator.c:161]: check_via_address(): (10.2.1.181, 10.2.1.181, >>> 0) >>> >>> >>> >>> Can anyone help me understand what's the problem? I have the server_id >>> setting, and the modparam server_id_filter, so shouldn't the receiving node >>> just ignore any database tasks? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Joel. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com >>> >>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>> >>> Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com >>> >>> Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- >>> www.kamailioworld.com >>> >>> -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- > www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com > Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- > www.kamailioworld.com > >
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
