A bit more information on the rtpproxy and kamailio exchange: this is what I receive on rtpproxy (2.1.0)
DBUG:GLOBAL:get_command: received command "11479_4 Uc18,8,0,101 109865504 90.66.177.103 30250 4178279503;1" INFO:GLOBAL:rtpp_command_ul_handle: new IPv4/IPv4 session 109865504, tag 4178279503;1 requested, type strong INFO:109865504:rtpp_command_ul_handle: new session on IPv4 port 51694 created, tag 4178279503;1 Regards, Aymeric Le jeu. 24 sept. 2020 à 15:33, Aymeric Moizard <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Hi, > > I have 2 hosts on AWS behind NAT: > > One with rtpproxy: > > /usr/local/bin/rtpproxy -f -p /run/rtpproxy/rtpproxy.pid -s udp: > 0.0.0.0:31500 -A 15.236.230.177 <http://15.236.230.177/15.236.230.177> -l > 0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0> -m 35000 -M 65000 -d DBUG:LOG_LOCAL5 -u > rtpproxy:rtpproxy -F > > The other one, with a kamailio and using only rtpproxy_manage(); without > parameters. > > I'm surprised because in my SDP being modified, kamailio is replacing with > its KAMILIO private IP. (not the rtpproxy one) > > I see that rtpproxy and kamailio are exchanging data. Nothing obvious > is coming out. > > Any obvious mistakes? > Anything you need to help? > Should I switch to another rtp engine? > > Regards > Aymeric > > -- > Antisip - http://www.antisip.com > -- Antisip - http://www.antisip.com
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List [email protected] https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
