It doesn’t make much sense to me.
On local installations (on-premise) I have 1 HAProxy and multiple kamailio 
servers.
On AWS I have multiple kamailio servers behind ELB.
On 8 Nov 2020, 19:45 +0200, Sergey Safarov <[email protected]>, wrote:
> you can try place haproxy + NAT on your own Linux router.
> In this case inbound connections with be delivered via HAproxy.
> Outbound connections will be NAT-ed on the same host, to the same IP.
>
> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 6:31 PM Joey Golan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I have a kamailio server running behind HAProxy with proxy protocol v2 
> > > enabled.
> > > In Kamailio I have set the parameter tcp_accept_haproxy=yes and loaded 
> > > tcpops module.
> > > UEs are registered using TLS and kamailio sees that the message has 
> > > received from their real ip address + port and not HAProxy ip + port.
> > > When UE A calls UE B, kamailio is trying to reach UE B using his real ip 
> > > address and port instead of HAProxy IP address + port.
> > >
> > > I know I can get the tcp ip and port of HAProxy using $tcp(c_si) and 
> > > $tcp(c_sp) but I can’t make it work.
> > > What is the right way to do this? How should I use these variables 
> > > properly in order to establish the call successfully?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Joey.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> [email protected]
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
[email protected]
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to