Thanks, I am seeing the same behaviour in sngrep.  The second INVITE with auth 
has incorrect SDP.

Initial INVITE sent to Supplier has correct SDP but no auth as expected.

Second INVITE sent to Supplier has reverted to the original SDP as sent from my 
phone, but has got the valid auth.  I expect to see the SDP "fixed" and same as 
the first INVITE.




INVITE sip:+3531246****@outbound.voxbone.com:5060 SIP/2.0
Record-Route: <sip:34.142.2****;lr;ftag=xgbjwzf22q;nat=yes>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
34.142.2*****:5060;branch=z9hG4bK809b.231d7fff2bdce55a1a947307855d425c.0
v: SIP/2.0/UDP 
192.168.68.113:5060;received=78.32.132.180;branch=z9hG4bK-6ttot8sa8aax;rport=38468
f: "voxboneGW" <sip:+353******@34.1******>;tag=xgbjwzf22q
t: <sip:00353124*****@34.14*******;user=phone>
i: 313632353134373536333537383634-z8yg9p65vbrf
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Max-Forwards: 69
User-Agent: snom725/8.9.3.60
m: 
<sip:[email protected]:5060;line=79fr6o6f;alias=78.32.132.180~38468~1>;reg-id=1
Accept: application/sdp
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, OPTIONS, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, PRACK, 
MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE
Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer, call-info
Supported: timer, 100rel, replaces, from-change
Session-Expires: 3600
Min-SE: 90
Authorization: Digest 
username="************",realm="34.1*****",nonce="*****************",uri="sip:00353124*****@34.14******;user=phone",response="********"
algorithm=MD5
c: application/sdp
l: 1611

v=0
o=root 26854354 26854354 IN IP4 34.1****
s=call
c=IN IP4 34.142.29.106
t=0 0
m=audio 30000 RTP/AVP 9 0 8 3 99 112 18 101
a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000
a=rtpmap:99 G726-32/8000
a=rtpmap:112 AAL2-G726-32/8000
a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000
a=fmtp:18 annexb=no
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-15
a=sendrecv
a=rtcp:30001
a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32 
inline:it3HWB/M7eeDc3LvQmB+THFQeiR0nEURqScfnNoy
a=crypto:2 AEAD_AES_256_GCM 
inline:pMqHMoWzb3xt9mlYSI2FZNlrK/X1lx1/U+TBk7XeHBauSe2IyWScSXZVTu8
a=crypto:3 AEAD_AES_128_GCM inline:4i9e+Ytn4jowBQRHtjxsxVl2uj22pgOhh/sI3w
a=crypto:4 AES_256_CM_HMAC_SHA1_80 
inline:VxvnS5sJYYrjXtPgi3v12kEV6gV9lJ4re/JSEO8FT18tVJMoIzmSje95HefAcw
a=crypto:5 AES_256_CM_HMAC_SHA1_32 
inline:NOpu3IsMJuDnPS6DketG/RO+w1mKJD/rdzRENVEF+Fnndez5Vu/yRK/Wr/Va2A
a=crypto:6 AES_192_CM_HMAC_SHA1_80 
inline:Rwnar613nUJLVJsYLPEFLP75dXb1bM607IbOw2lwop2wMDdRG4Y
a=crypto:7 AES_192_CM_HMAC_SHA1_32 
inline:hPEp3Nzl0tGuCI84Wk+cj6fTClM+3Nd5cryDSMEpKtiRImyKeiU
a=crypto:8 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 
inline:PEPvkt5duD33hu1zFtiH+iU8z0L6fnJ8ascFg5H6
a=crypto:9 F8_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:BMXOw0RQWKwaq9BC1p5+Q92z7TOQiv8jF1/6ND9V
a=crypto:10 F8_128_HMAC_SHA1_32 inline:Ee7vaANwfj97CPdqtFbBfjDhAd5t7Coi0z4UjOPU
a=crypto:11 NULL_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:afMj9BI7C6MC7E4NB56n8A/BxQumLBJg1j2FECYA
a=crypto:12 NULL_HMAC_SHA1_32 inline:fNyMLrqdc+ffmGRnmp0BTkv7wvN48CTRWWJmctCH
a=setup:actpass
a=fingerprint:sha-256 
C3:76:76:64:C3:7E:3C:B5:47:1A:D6:44:B6:CD:BF:0E:C7:77:43:08:D6:EA:D6:39:33:3C:BA:21:FF:89:82:E7





==========================================================================
​INVITE sip:00353124*****@34.1*****;user=phone SIP/2.0
v: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.68.113:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-6ttot8sa8aax;rport
f: "voxboneGW" <sip:+35312******@34.1****>;tag=xgbjwzf22q
t: <sip:00353124*****@34.1*****;user=phone>
i: 313632353134373536333537383634-z8yg9p65vbrf
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Max-Forwards: 70
User-Agent: snom725/8.9.3.60
m: <sip:[email protected]:5060;line=79fr6o6f>;reg-id=1
Accept: application/sdp
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, OPTIONS, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, PRACK, 
MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE
Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer, call-info
Supported: timer, 100rel, replaces, from-change
Session-Expires: 3600
Min-SE: 90
Authorization: Digest 
username="*****",realm="*****",nonce="Y*******",uri="sip:003531******@34.14****;user=phone",response="**********"
algorithm=MD5
c: application/sdp
l: 487

v=0
o=root 26854354 26854354 IN IP4 192.168.68.113
s=call
c=IN IP4 192.168.68.113
t=0 0
m=audio 10742 RTP/AVP 9 0 8 3 99 112 18 101
a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32 
inline:it3HWB/M7eeDc3LvQmB+THFQeiR0nEURqScfnNoy
a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000
a=rtpmap:99 G726-32/8000
a=rtpmap:112 AAL2-G726-32/8000
a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000
a=fmtp:18 annexb=no
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-15
a=ptime:20
a=sendrecv

​

________________________________
From: sr-users <[email protected]> on behalf of Yuriy 
Gorlichenko <[email protected]>
Sent: 02 July 2021 10:03
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] UAC_AUTH with RTPEngine NAT

You won't see proper $mb after rtpengine changes in that way. $mb will be 
rewritten on the latest stage of packet processing. See sngrep or wireshark or 
either use read_sdp_pv / write_sdp_pv

Also our can use apply_message_changes before log, but I would not recommend to 
do so if this is a production under load.

On Fri, 2 Jul 2021, 10:28 Paul Smith, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


Hi,

[Note I posted this yesterday from the wrong email address.]


I am struggling to see why my SDP is not being set correctly on the INVITE to 
my supplier with Proxy-Authentication when I use uac_auth().

The initial INVITE to my supplier has correct SDP set by rtpengine_manage. Then 
supplier replies with a 407.  My failure route correctly handles the Auth, and 
also calls NATMANAGE again... but this time the SDP is unchanged and the 
private IP and original media information from the original device is relayed 
to my supplier.

kamailio.cfg isbased on the default config.  Running kamailio 5.4.6 and using 
example from uac module for uac_auth.

My failure route calls NATMANAGE.  Is there anything special about uac_auth?  
Do I need some extra magic to apply the message body changes after I have run 
rtpengine_manage().


I can see that the NATMANAGEr test for nat_uac_test("8") is true, and 
rtpengine_manage() s being called.  But the outgoing SDP is not changed.


Thanks for any hints!

Paul


====================

Extract of kamailio.cfg


failure_route[TRUNKAUTH] {

    if (t_is_canceled()) {

        exit;

    }

    route(NATMANAGE);

    xlog("L_INFO","In failure route, just finshed NATMANAGE and now body is 
$mb");

    if(t_check_status("401|407")) {

        # $avp(auser) = "test";

        # $avp(apass) = "test";

        # $avp(apass) = "36d0a02793542b4961e8348347236dbf";

        if (uac_auth()) {

                t_relay();

        }

        exit;

    }

}






__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
  * [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the 
sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
  * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
  * [email protected]
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the 
sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
  * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to