Hi Alex, have a look to the FAQ link I quoted earlier, they give some examples there.
Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com -----Original Message----- From: sr-users <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 1:27 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] SEMS license with kamailio and rtpengine > On Feb 9, 2022, at 7:02 AM, Henning Westerholt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Generally speaking - if you combine "closely" GPL v2 and proprietary code, > the result needs to be also GPLv2. So, your example would not work from a > licence point of view for proprietary licensing. Well, that’s just it; what’s the standard of “closely” being appealed to here, in technical terms? I assume the licence leaves it sufficiently vague that any given case would need to be judicially tested, but perhaps there is ample prior experience with architectures substantially similar to Kamailio? — Alex -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions * [email protected] Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions * [email protected] Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
