Hallo so far I have no reaction on my question. Has anybody similar experience that t_cancel_callid() doesn't insert Reason header, if called from branch 0?
What are differences between branch 0 and other branches? Regards. Pavel. On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 3:17 PM Pavel Veselovsky <[email protected]> wrote: > Hallo all, > > I defined branch_failure routing block via t_on_branch_failure() > In the branch_failure route, in case of "408 Request timeout" I am sending > CANCEL with reason "t_cancel_callid("$ci", "$cs", "22", "408")". > > If the t_cancel_callid("$ci", "$cs", "22", "408") is called in > branch_failure for branch idx 0, the CANCEL is sent, but Reason header is > missing there. > Why? (I expect that t_cancel_callid() should insert Reason header > regardless of branch it is called from) > > If the t_cancel_callid is called in branch idx !=0, the CANCEL contains > Reason header with cause as expected. > > Thanks for clarification of this behavior, > Pavel. > > P.S. code snipset: > event_route[tm:branch-failure:primary] > { > if ($T(reply_code) == "408") > { > if ($avp(branch_idx) == $T_branch_idx) > { > if (t_cancel_callid("$ci", "$cs", "22", "408")) > { > xlog("L_INFO", "CANCEL sent ci:$ci, cs:$cs 408"); > } > else > { > xlog("L_INFO", "CANCEL not sent ... ci:$ci, cs:$cs 408"); > } > > $var(_palotmp_) = "sip:" + $avp(replaced_cfnry_target_number) > + "@" + $dd + ":" + $dp + ";user=phone"; > append_branch($var(_palotmp_),"1.0"); > > t_relay(); > return; > } > } > } > >
__________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions * [email protected] Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
