I will try this, thanks a lot for your help. regards.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:43 PM Alex Balashov <[email protected]> wrote: > Setting t_on_failure("FAILURE_ROUTE") before t_relay(), given a route > block failure_route[FAILURE_ROUTE], as you are doing, should work. > > -- > Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC > > Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) > Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ > > > -- > Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC > > Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) > Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 8:34 AM Antonio Couto <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks for your support, I am trying to do this but to be honest I don't >> know >> how to arm the failure route for this case of "fr_inv_timer". >> >> When I received reply 183 I use t_set_fr() function to set the new value >> for "fr_inv_timer", >> do far so good, but I never received failure_route[0] when Kamailio >> terminate the call sending 408, >> even calling like this: >> >> t_on_failure("0"); >> t_relay(); >> >> I can't find on documentation how to do this. >> Thanks a lot >> >> >> >>
__________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions * [email protected] Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
