Hi,
if I remove only 1 of 2 it is not against the standard, because one Via
header line is still inside.
But if I modify the documentation I would write:
"Attention: it is not working with a Via header field"
Then everyone thinks: ok, that is the only point where it will not work.
But how can I, as not a kamailio programmer, can know if this is really
the only case?
So I would also write something which is not 100% correct.
This has to be done by a guy who knows this, and not by me as a kamailio
learner.
Best regards,
Bernd
Am 11.08.2022 um 12:56 schrieb Henning Westerholt:
Hi Bernd,
The Via header is mandatory according to RFC 3261, section 20, in Requests:
Header field where proxy ACK BYE CAN INV OPT REG
___________________________________________________________________
[..]
Via R amr m m m m m m
You are asking Kamailio to do something that is against the standard. So, some
people might expect that it's not working in this case, and I personally would
not call it a Bug.
Documentation would be never fully complete for a complex software like
Kamailio, sure.
You could open a feature request or (even better) a pull request to improve the
documentation for the textops module in the Kamailio github.
Cheers,
Henning
--
EDNT GmbH
Werner-von-Siemens-Strasse 7
64625 Bensheim
www.ednt.de
Registergericht: Darmstadt
Registernummer: 24972
Geschäftsführerin: Kerstin Knapp
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
* [email protected]
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
* https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
