Since on the topic of tsilo:
1. I watched Federico’s presentation on it from 2015, and his examples
insinuate that it is necessary to store the index and label of a suspended
transaction in some external vehicle, e.g. htable, for use with ts_append_to().
Why would one do this when it is possible to call ts_append() based on R-URI
alone?
2. The appropriate pattern of interaction between tsilo and http_async_client —
which I imagine to be a rather common use-case — is rather unclear.
If I use http_async_query() to call out to a PN service, with
$http_req(suspend) = 1, what should happen to the current instance of SIP
request processing?
That is to say:
request_route {
. . .
t_check_trans();
if(is_method(“REGISTER”)) {
. . .
save(“location”, “0x06”);
if(ts_append(“location”, “$tu”)) {
xlog(“success”);
}
return;
}
else if(is_method(“INVITE”)) {
# PN stuff.
ts_store(“$var(uri)”);
http_async_query(“http://url”, “PUSH_REPLY”);
return; # <— ???
}
}
route[HTTP_PUSH_REPLY] {
. . .
if(!t_relay())
sl_reply_error();
}
I should add that this proxy front-ends a registrar, but is not in itself a
registrar. It contains a shadow registrar - hence the save() calls - in order
to be able to take advantage of the ’tsilo’ module, given its dependency on
registrar/usrloc.
This leads to the difference that the gateway receives requests with RURIs that
have already been resolved to a contact binding elsewhere, so there are no
lookup() calls. How should this play into the http_async_client workflow?
Appreciate any help!
— Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
[email protected]
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
