Hi, I am very happy with Topos and redis for such things. You should give it a try. And topos had some nice contact header features also.
Benoit Panizzon <[email protected]> schrieb am Do., 26. Jan. 2023, 16:01: > Hi > > I'm trying to work around Route-Header and Via Issues with the two > topology hiding modules topoh and topos and trying to figure out, which > one works better for our environment. > > My conclusion so far: > > topos creates very clean header, but needs a database or redis. I'm > always reluctant in adding more components which could fail or cause > load. > > topoh also works, but it worries me a bit that according to the manual: > > https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/topoh.html#topoh.p.mask_ip > a private IP is used to mask the contact header. > > I have come across a CPE which, as far as I see, is misbehaving by > ALWAYS sending a PRACK to the Hostname or IP found in the Contact > header, and ignoring Route and Via Header. > > So why using a private IP as 'mask' and not the IP or Hostname of the > actual kamailio instance? > > Mit freundlichen Grüssen > > -Benoît Panizzon- > -- > I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden > ______________________________________________________ > > Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 > CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 > Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch > ______________________________________________________ > __________________________________________________________ > Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to > the sender! > Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >
__________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
