You don't need to do so in branch route. You can do this within request_route.
On Thu, 4 May 2023, 12:55 Benoit Panizzon, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello > > Is there a possibility to send a reply from within a branch route? > > Experimental case (yes, I know it's a non working set-up, but I just > wonder if that would be possible). > > Two registrar nodes, location information shared between the two. > > CPE registers via TLS, therefore the existing connection shall be used > towards the CPE and that only exists on one of the registrars. > > So in the Branch Route I would like to do something like: > > $var(socket) = $(ulc(aor=>socket)[$T_branch_idx]); > > if ($var(socket) == 0) { > send_reply("503","no local socket"); > } > > This would cause the core routing instance to select the next registrar > from the dispatcher list which hopefully holds the active socket. > > But none of the 'send_reply' variants seem to be allowed within a > branch route. > > Or is there a better solution? > > Mit freundlichen Grüssen > > -Benoît Panizzon- > -- > I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden > ______________________________________________________ > > Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 > CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 > Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch > ______________________________________________________ > __________________________________________________________ > Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to > the sender! > Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >
__________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
