Thanks for the update,

Q: You are using DMQ to replicate usrloc between registrars ?
A:  Yes.

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 8:42 PM Julien Chavanton <[email protected]>
wrote:

> You are using DMQ to replicate usrloc between registrars ?
> This should not affect the "proxy servers", although their exact role is
> not mentioned.
> If this is the case, you could do some kamcmd ul.dump on both registrars.
> Also the DMQ traffic can be traced by tcpdump etc.
>
> You may also want to validate the DMQ bus, "the way each node learns about
> the other ones."
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 10:46 AM satyaprakash ch via sr-users <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There are two proxy servers and two registrar servers with DMQ enabled,
>> and we have upgraded the proxy servers to 5.7.4 and the registrar servers
>> to 5.5.5.
>>
>> Kamailio proxy version 5.7.4
>> Kamailio registrar version: 5.5.5
>>
>> Following the upgrade of the proxy server to 5.7.4, calls are not working
>> and no response is received.
>> Once again, we have reverted the proxy server to 5.5.5, so that the proxy
>> server and the registrar server version are now the same.The calls are now
>> working as expected.
>>
>> We suspect it could be an DMQ issue.
>>
>> I would appreciate your suggestions on this matter of compatibility
>> between proxy and registry servers.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> __________________________________________________________
>> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to
>> the sender!
>> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
>>
>
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the 
sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:

Reply via email to