Thank you, I have solved it. The issue was we are sending invite to kamailio as dst port 5062 . Kamailio listening on 5062 and 5060. So the response bye is sending from 5060 socket. I have forced the socket 5062 to send back and that solved it. Thanks
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 1:05 PM Henning Westerholt <h...@gilawa.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > > if you are doing this manual remove_hf(..) steps in relation to a > Record-Route header, you are most certainly doing something wrong in your > configuration. > > > > Maybe you can first try a setup (e.g. in your lab) without topos. It > should continue to work also after you have added topos then there. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Henning > > > > *From:* Arun K R via sr-users <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 12, 2024 6:25 AM > *To:* Patrick Karton <patrickar...@hotmail.com> > *Cc:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>; > Arun K R <mail4aru...@gmail.com> > *Subject:* [SR-Users] Re: topos module issue on hangup > > > > Yes , I am using record_route function and also topos module. > > My carrier need invite without Record-Route and Route header. But when I > use topos module everything works fine, but BYE from the carrier is not > routing back to the agent. > > I have tried without topos module to remove Record-Route header using > remove_hf() function, but I found that the Record-Route header is adding at > t_relay(), so that I am not able to remove it. > > As the topos module hides contact, via and routing headers, how should I > route the BYE from carrier to the agent. I would like to get solution with > or without topos module. > > > > My kamailio receives Bye from carrier on its local Interface and it should > be routed to the agent through the public interface > > > > interface 1: public ip > > interface 2 : private IP ( where carrier is connected) > > > > Thanks > > Arun > > > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 8:04 PM Patrick Karton <patrickar...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This is the purpose of topos module to hide Via, Contact, Record-Route and > Route headers. > > > > If you configure and use it properly there should not be any routing issue. > > > > Do you call record_route function in your kamailio script ? > > > > Le 11 juin 2024 14:10, Arun K R via sr-users <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> > a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > I am using topos module to hide Record-Route and Route header as per the > requirement from carrier. But the topos module hides, contact, via and > routing headers also. Due to this reason when I am getting bye from the > carrier I am not able to route the bye back to the agent. > > > > Bye from Agent to carrier is working fine. > > > > Bye from carrier to my internal network interface is not routing to client > through public interface. I assume this may be because Via / Contact header > has been hidden and changed by the topos module with the invite > > > > please help me for this > > Thanks > > Arun > > > >
__________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
