Additional information. I have even upgraded to the latest kamailio version
5.8.2 with no luck in resolution on this issue.

Regards

*Maharaja Azhagiah*






On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 10:11 AM Maharaja Azhagiah <er.mahar...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi
>
> I have upgraded kamailio to 5.7.6 and I still see the issue when call
> failover to the provider configured carrierfailureroute, RURI changed back
> to the first / primary carrier
>
> Call fails due to 488 and rewrites to next carrier
>
> 36(194) INFO: {1 32676 INVITE P4GVS5mWnATVHneyX047QAx6Zv0ivpw3} <script>:
> [callid: P4GVS5mWnATVHneyX047QAx6Zv0ivpw3] - [cfg:2624] (INVITE)
> RTF_CARRIERS (sip:14379892230@216.82.236.254:5061;transport=TLS) Called
> for outbound mazhagiah1test.sip.sandbox.com, RU: 14379892230, RD:
> 216.82.236.254, 488
> 36(194) DEBUG: {1 32676 INVITE P4GVS5mWnATVHneyX047QAx6Zv0ivpw3} tm
> [t_lookup.c:1565]: t_check_msg(): msg (0x7ff946d395f8) id=0/160 global
> id=0/160 T start=0x7ff946d00f48
> 36(194) DEBUG: {1 32676 INVITE P4GVS5mWnATVHneyX047QAx6Zv0ivpw3} tm
> [t_lookup.c:1641]: t_check_msg(): T (0x7ff946d00f48) already found for msg
> (0x7ff946d395f8)!
> 36(194) DEBUG: {1 32676 INVITE P4GVS5mWnATVHneyX047QAx6Zv0ivpw3} tmx
> [t_var.c:554]: pv_get_tm_reply_code(): reply code is <488>
> 36(194) DEBUG: {1 32676 INVITE P4GVS5mWnATVHneyX047QAx6Zv0ivpw3}
> carrierroute [cr_func.c:163]: set_next_domain_on_rule(): searching for
> matching routing rules36(194) INFO: {1 32676 INVITE
> P4GVS5mWnATVHneyX047QAx6Zv0ivpw3} carrierroute [cr_func.c:184]:
> set_next_domain_on_rule(): next_domain is 47987
> 36(194) INFO: {1 32676 INVITE P4GVS5mWnATVHneyX047QAx6Zv0ivpw3} <script>:
> [callid: P4GVS5mWnATVHneyX047QAx6Zv0ivpw3] - [cfg:2633] (INVITE) r-uri
> (sip:14379892230@216.82.236.254:5061;transport=TLS) carrier_tree:
> outbound Next-lookup_domain: 47987 -----------------------
> 36(194) DEBUG: {1 32676 INVITE P4GVS5mWnATVHneyX047QAx6Zv0ivpw3}
> carrierroute [cr_func.c:449]: rewrite_on_rule(): searching for matching
> routing rules36(194) DEBUG: {1 32676 INVITE
> P4GVS5mWnATVHneyX047QAx6Zv0ivpw3} carrierroute [prime_hash.c:66]:
> hash_func(): hash: 2729722775 % 1000 = 775
> 36(194) INFO: {1 32676 INVITE P4GVS5mWnATVHneyX047QAx6Zv0ivpw3}
> carrierroute [cr_func.c:689]: ki_cr_do_route_helper(): uri 14379892230 was
> rewritten to sip:14379892...@sip.telnyx.com, carrier 1, domain 47987
> 36(194) DEBUG: {1 32676 INVITE P4GVS5mWnATVHneyX047QAx6Zv0ivpw3} <script>:
> [callid: P4GVS5mWnATVHneyX047QAx6Zv0ivpw3]-[cfg:2594] domain (
> sip.telnyx.com) starts with TELNYX_SIP_TLD, checking hijacking
> 36(194) DEBUG: {1 32676 INVITE P4GVS5mWnATVHneyX047QAx6Zv0ivpw3} <script>:
> [callid: P4GVS5mWnATVHneyX047QAx6Zv0ivpw3]-[cfg:2600] domain postfix: com
>
> However, after http_async_query for stir/shaken header, RURI still remains
> with the primary carrier domain
>
> 26(184) DEBUG: pv [pv_core.c:1358]: pv_get_dsturi_attr(): no destination
> URI
> 26(184) WARNING: <script>: [callid:
> P4GVS5mWnATVHneyX047QAx6Zv0ivpw3]{INVITE} - [RELAY] use udp/udp/1 Protocol
> strict relay dest:<null>  
> RURI:sip:14379892230@216.82.236.254:5061;transport=TLS
> dest-proto:<null> ruri-proto:TLS next-hop Proto: TLS
>
> I have attached the log in the following link due to file size.
>
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dNS7Iyptz2x5evaVF-oSb-Erc4YIeuiW/view?usp=sharing
>
> Please help to understand and fix this issue.
>
>
> Regards
>
> *Maharaja Azhagiah*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 6:30 AM Henning Westerholt <h...@gilawa.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> Using http_async_query can change some script behaviour due to some side
>> effects, I noticed this also e.g. on rtpengine functions.
>>
>>
>>
>> I did not looked into your cfg in details, but one easy option from your
>> side would be to try a maintained Kamailio version (e.g. 5.7.x) and see if
>> the problem also is observable there.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>>
>> Henning
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Maharaja Azhagiah via sr-users <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
>> *Sent:* Montag, 18. März 2024 22:21
>> *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
>> *Cc:* Maharaja Azhagiah <er.mahar...@gmail.com>
>> *Subject:* [SR-Users] http_async_query on carrierfailureroute changes rd
>> back to carrieroute primary
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>>
>>
>> I am running kamailio 5.4 on debian
>>
>>
>> I have carrierfailureroute configured incase of primary service provider
>> fails. I also have Stirshaken configured to add Identity header on outbound
>> calls. Issue is when call fail overs to carrierfailureroute,
>> http_async_query changes $ru to the primary carrier
>>
>> From the debug logs, when primary carrier sends a 488 (primary carrier
>> expects SIP TLS but my call is UDP - to test the failover scenario)
>>
>> 39(285) DEBUG: {1 18398 INVITE 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn} tmx
>> [t_var.c:561]: pv_get_tm_reply_code(): reply code is <488>
>> 39(285) DEBUG: {1 18398 INVITE 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn}
>> carrierroute [cr_func.c:178]: set_next_domain_on_rule(): searching for
>> matching routing rules39(285) INFO: {1 18398 INVITE
>> 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn} carrierroute [cr_func.c:197]:
>> set_next_domain_on_rule(): next_domain is 47987
>>
>> Carrier route rewrites the failover carrier
>>
>> 39(285) INFO: {1 18398 INVITE 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn}
>> carrierroute [cr_func.c:706]: cr_do_route(): uri 14371234567 was rewritten
>> to sip:14371234...@sip.primaryprovider.com, carrier 1, domain 47987
>>
>> Before http_async_query rd and ru are still the failover carrier
>>
>> 39(285) INFO: {1 18398 INVITE 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn} <script>:
>> [callid: 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn] - [cfg:2976] - Debug testing
>> ----- rd is sip.primaryprovider.com ----- ru is
>> sip:14371234...@sip.primaryprovider.com
>> 39(285) DEBUG: {1 18398 INVITE 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn}
>> http_async_client [async_http.c:469]: async_send_query(): transaction
>> suspended [5261:1830449764]
>> 39(285) DEBUG: {1 18398 INVITE 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn}
>> http_async_client [async_http.c:625]: async_push_query(): query sent [
>> https://authn-uat.ccid.neustar.biz/ccid/authn/v2/identity?apiKey=randomkey]
>> (0x7fdcad097e60) to worker 1
>>
>> However, when the route is being called after the http_async_query it
>> changes to the primary one:
>>
>> 26(272) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1612]: t_lookup_ident_filter(): transaction
>> found
>> 26(272) DEBUG: http_async_client [async_http.c:235]: async_http_cb():
>> resuming transaction (5261:1830449764)
>> 26(272) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1612]: t_lookup_ident_filter(): transaction
>> found
>> 26(272) INFO: <script>: [callid: 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn] -
>> [cfg:2995] - Debug testing ----- rd is 1.2.3.4 ----- ru is
>> sip:14371234567@1.2.3.4:5061;transport=TLS
>>
>> Due to this, call keeps going to the primary and it fails
>>
>> if ( http_async_query(STIRSHAKEN_AS_URL, "AS_RESPONSE") == -1 ) {
>> xlog("L_ERR ", "[cfg:$cfg(line)] Failed to connect AS service for token
>> $fu -> $tu \n");
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> route[AS_RESPONSE] {
>> xlog("L_INFO", "[callid: $ci] - [cfg:$cfg(line)] - Debug testing ----- rd
>> is $rd ----- ru is $ru\n");
>> if ($http_ok) {
>> xlog("L_INFO", "[cfg:$cfg(line)] Resuming outbound call transaction for
>> $fu -> $tu Received - $http_rb \n");
>> # Add identity and Date headers
>> if (jansson_get("identity", $http_rb, "$var(identity)")) {
>> insert_hf("Identity: $var(identity)\n", "Content-Length");
>> }
>> if (jansson_get("date", $http_rb, "$var(date)")) {
>> if ($hdr(Date) != $null){
>> remove_hf("Date");
>> }
>> insert_hf("Date: $var(date)\n", "Identity");
>> }
>> } else {
>> xlog("L_ERR", "[cfg:$cfg(line)] Resuming outbound call transaction. Error
>> -  $http_err)\n");
>> }
>>
>>     route(RELAY);
>> exit;
>> }
>>
>> Please help to understand why rd / ru changes to primary carrier.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Maharaja Azhagiah
>>
>
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the 
sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:

Reply via email to