Thanks, Henning Yes, I added a return statement and it works around the problem in this case, but I'd not like to find the bug appearing somewhere else (in another route for example). Should I open a Github Issue for this sort of thing?
James On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 at 16:42, Henning Westerholt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello James, > > good point, we were able to confirm this. There is an easy work-around by > just adding an if statement around it. > > Nevertheless, I agree that this is unexpected behaviour and should be further > investigated. > > Cheers, > > Henning > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: James Browne via sr-users <[email protected]> > > Sent: Freitag, 1. November 2024 14:02 > > To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <[email protected]> > > Cc: James Browne <[email protected]> > > Subject: [SR-Users] Last line of onreply_route (drops reply) > > > > Hi all > > I noticed, in my config, that if the last line of the reply_route is a > > function that > > does not succeed, then the SIP response is not relayed and kamailio throws > > an > > error. I've searched documentation to indicate why this might be, but I > > can't > > find anything, so this looks to me like a bug. > > I use 5.8.1 for testing. > > > > Here's a sample config that shows what goes wrong. > > #################### > > #!KAMAILIO > > listen=udp:203.0.113.57:5060 > > debug=1 > > loadmodule "textops" > > request_route{exit;} > > reply_route{remove_hf_re("^X-Custom");} > > #################### > > > > Here's a sample SIP message that works. When I send this to > > udp:203.0.113.57:5060, kamailio relays it. > > #################### > > SIP/2.0 200 Testing > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 203.0.113.57:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 198.18.0.157:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z > > T: <sip:c@s>;tag=676fbf45 > > F: <sip:c@s>;tag=676fbf45 > > X-Custom: lkjdfl > > i: testing-XXX > > CSeq: 1 INFO > > l: 0 > > #################### > > > > If I then remove the X-Custom header field from the SIP reply and try again, > > the message does not get relayed and I see this in the log. > > > > 5(1356) WARNING: <core> [core/receive.c:605]: receive_msg(): error while > > trying onreply script > > > > If I put a log command after the remove_hf_re(), then the message gets > > relayed. It looks like the reply_route always fails if the last function is > > not > > successful. > > Is this normal or is it a bug? > > > > James > > __________________________________________________________ > > Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe > > send an email to [email protected] > > Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the > > sender! > > Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
