Most SNMP counters roll over at some point. Clients are ready for that and 
handle the rollover. 

There’s some text about it here:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/simple-network-management-protocol-snmp/26007-faq-snmpcounter.html

and here

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2718283/definition-of-snmp-gauge32-vs-counter32
Definition of SNMP Gauge32 vs Counter32
stackoverflow.com


Good to hear that there’s usage of the SNMP module. :-)

/O

> On 15 Jan 2025, at 09:50, Igor Potjevlesch <igor.potjevle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello Olle,
>  
> Do you mean there is a scale limit? Maybe because the counter is 32bits 
> counter?
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Igor.
>  
> De : Olle E. Johansson <o...@edvina.net <mailto:o...@edvina.net>> 
> Envoyé : mardi 14 janvier 2025 12:47
> À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org 
> <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
> Cc : Olle E Johansson <o...@edvina.net <mailto:o...@edvina.net>>; Henning 
> Westerholt <h...@gilawa.com <mailto:h...@gilawa.com>>; Igor Potjevlesch 
> <igor.potjevle...@gmail.com <mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com>>
> Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Module snmpstats reporting inconsistent call success 
> metrics on intense peaks of failed calls
>  
> Note that SNMP counters wrap, so it may be expected behaviour.
>  
> /O
> 
> 
>> On 14 Jan 2025, at 11:51, Igor Potjevlesch via sr-users 
>> <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>> wrote:
>>  
>> Hello Henning,
>>  
>> Undertstood! Thank you. If there is nothing to do, we will move on the 
>> upgrade.
>>  
>> Regards,
>>  
>> Igor. 
>>  
>> De : Henning Westerholt <h...@gilawa.com <mailto:h...@gilawa.com>> 
>> Envoyé : lundi 13 janvier 2025 17:20
>> À : 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List' <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org 
>> <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
>> Cc : Igor Potjevlesch <igor.potjevle...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com>>
>> Objet : RE: [SR-Users] Module snmpstats reporting inconsistent call success 
>> metrics on intense peaks of failed calls
>>  
>> Hello Igor,
>>  
>> hard to say 100%, because it could be also caused from another module (the 
>> snmp modules also takes data from other sources I think).
>>  
>> Generally, I would always of course recommended to use a maintained version 
>> in production.
>>  
>> Cheers,
>>  
>> Henning
>>  
>> From: Igor Potjevlesch <igor.potjevle...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com>> 
>> Sent: Montag, 13. Januar 2025 15:12
>> To: Henning Westerholt <h...@gilawa.com <mailto:h...@gilawa.com>>; 'Kamailio 
>> (SER) - Users Mailing List' <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org 
>> <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
>> Subject: RE: [SR-Users] Module snmpstats reporting inconsistent call success 
>> metrics on intense peaks of failed calls
>>  
>> Hello Henning,
>>  
>> Thank you for your check.
>> Do you mean that even if we upgrade to the latest branch, we will probably 
>> face the same issue?
>>  
>> Regards,
>>  
>> Igor.
>>  
>> De : Henning Westerholt <h...@gilawa.com <mailto:h...@gilawa.com>> 
>> Envoyé : lundi 13 janvier 2025 14:36
>> À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org 
>> <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>>
>> Cc : Igor Potjevlesch <igor.potjevle...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com>>
>> Objet : RE: [SR-Users] Module snmpstats reporting inconsistent call success 
>> metrics on intense peaks of failed calls
>>  
>> Hello Igor,
>>  
>> this sounds like a bug to me. The 5.6.x branch is not supported anymore, but 
>> after I a quick look I did not spotted any recent bugfixes in the modules 
>> that could match.
>>  
>> Cheers,
>>  
>> Henning
>>  
>> -- 
>> Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
>> Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com <https://gilawa.com/>
>>  
>>  
>> From: Igor Potjevlesch via sr-users <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org 
>> <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>> 
>> Sent: Montag, 13. Januar 2025 13:40
>> To: sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
>> Cc: Igor Potjevlesch <igor.potjevle...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com>>
>> Subject: [SR-Users] Module snmpstats reporting inconsistent call success 
>> metrics on intense peaks of failed calls
>>  
>> Hello!
>>  
>> We are plotting the call success rate on each of our proxies.
>> Using the Kamailio snmpstats module, we try to obtain three counters to plot 
>> them on a graph:
>>  
>>     Total Calls
>>     Active Calls
>>     Error Calls
>>  
>> Most of the time, everything works well, and we obtain sensible values:
>> snmpwalk -c mycommunity -v 2c W.X.Y.Z 1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2 -O n
>>  
>>     .1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2.1.0 = Gauge32: 309 -> Total Calls
>>     .1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2.2.0 = Gauge32: 95 -> Active Calls
>>     .1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2.3.0 = Gauge32: 214 -> Error calls
>>  
>> However, when our proxies are facing intense peaks of failed calls in a 
>> short time span, sometimes, the "Error Calls" counter returns a value higher 
>> than "Total Calls". As a result, "Active Calls" suddenly reaches a value 
>> close to the maximum of a Gauge32 (because T o t a l C a l l s − E r r o r C 
>> a l l s < 0 ).
>>  
>> snmpwalk -c mycommunity -v 2c W.X.Y.Z 1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2 -O n
>>  
>>     .1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2.1.0 = Gauge32: 153 -> Total Calls
>>     .1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2.2.0 = Gauge32: 4294967226 -> Active Calls
>>     .1.3.6.1.4.1.34352.3.1.3.1.3.2.3.0 = Gauge32: 223 -> Error calls
>>  
>> As a result, our graphs make no more sense.
>>  
>> We are currently running kamailio 5.6.4.
>>  
>> Any idea if it's a bug or a configuration issue?
>>  
>> Regards,
>>  
>> Igor. 
>>  
>> <image001.jpg> 
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>      
>> Sans virus.www.avast.com 
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>  
>> __________________________________________________________
>> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- 
>> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
>> To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org 
>> <mailto:sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org>
>> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the 
>> sender!

__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- 
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the 
sender!

Reply via email to