Thanks for the reply!

After struggling a bit to set up RTPEngine for RHEL 9, I was finally able to 
run RTPEngine on the master branch.
Currently, I'am trying to match the exact situation as the one I had with 
RTPproxy.
Does anyone have any suggestions on what flags to use in kamalio when sending 
rtpengine_manage?

Currently, I also receive a warning saying: " Interface 'int' not found, using 
default". Any thoughts on this?
I have configured an "ext" and "int" network interfaces in the rtpengine 
configuration.

Kind regads
Ibe Van de Veire
System Engineer
[email protected]
Auguste Reyerslaan 52
B-1043 Brussel



-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Alex Balashov <[email protected]>
Verzonden: donderdag 25 september 2025 15:18
Aan: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <[email protected]>
CC: Ibe Van de Veire <[email protected]>
Onderwerp: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio SBC using RTPproxy

[U ontvang niet vaak e-mail van [email protected]. Meer informatie over 
waarom dit belangrijk is, vindt u op 
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification]

You may have more luck with RTPEngine in this regard.

> On Sep 25, 2025, at 9:02 AM, Ibe Van de Veire via sr-users 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear Kamailio community,
>  I am currently developing a VoIP system using 2 instances of Kamailio. One 
> as SBC and one as SIP server.
> The SBC is configured to work in bridge mode (one NIC on the public side, one 
> NIC on the private side).
> The SIP server works as expected.
>  But the SBC server seems to have some difficulties to route the RTP traffic.
> I am using RTPproxy to handle NAT traversals.
>  Currently, I handled the following situations:
>     • Internal to internal call
>     • External (both NAT and CG-NAT) to internal call
>     • Internal to external (both NAT and CG-NAT) call  The situation
> that does not work is the following:
>     • External (both NAT or CG-NAT) to External (both NAT or CG-NAT)
> The SBC seems to always translate the IN IP4 field from external to internal 
> (as desired when calling from external to internal), but this seems not to be 
> desired when calling from external to external.
> This way, both external devices try to send the RTP data to the internal 
> (inaccessible) address of the SBC.
> How can I configure the SBC to stop translating the IN IP4 field when both 
> devices are external?
>  I have the following configuration that talks to the RTPproxy service:
>  ==========================
>     if(nat_uac_test("8")) {
>         if($Ri == "MY_PUBLIC_IP") {
>             rtpproxy_manage("coiew");
>         } else {
>             rtpproxy_manage("faei");
>         }
>     } else {
>         rtpproxy_manage("cor");
>     }
> ==========================
>   Also, is this the desired way to handle NAT traversal with RTPproxy?
>  Kind regards
> Ibe Van de Veire
> System Engineer
>
> -- Disclaimer --
> Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie Auguste Reyerslaan 52
> 1043 Brussel
>
> nv van publiek recht
> BTW BE 0244.142.664
> RPR Brussel
> VRT Gebruikersvoorwaarden
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions --
> [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to
> [email protected]
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the 
> sender!


--
Alex Balashov
Principal Consultant
Evariste Systems LLC
Web: https://evaristesys.com/, https://www.csrpswitch.com/
Tel: +1-706-510-6800


-- Disclaimer --
Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie
Auguste Reyerslaan 52
1043 Brussel

nv van publiek recht
BTW BE 0244.142.664
RPR Brussel
VRT Gebruikersvoorwaarden <http://www.vrt.be/gebruiksvoorwaarden>

__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the 
sender!

Reply via email to