Hola Iñaki,
> Hi, I must deal with a B2BUA which keeps the original SDP unchanged > except the fact that it removes the "a=nortpproxy:yes" line added by > RtpProxy. > The B2BUA intercommunicates two Kamailio, both forcing its own RtpProxy > server. > > I've not tested it again but expect there will be no RTP as each > RtpProxy will wait for RTP coming from the other. Am I right? > Of course I could force RtpProxy just in NAT cases and so, but I > prefer to force it always so the clients of each Kamailio can > configure QoS for the media addresses (different in each server). Is > there some workaround for it? You can use "-f" with force_rtp_proxy() : f - instructs nathelper to ignore marks inserted by another nathelper in transit to indicate that the session is already goes through another proxy. Allows creating chain of proxies. > In the other hand: is it possible two different Kamailio's to share > the same RtpProxy server? I've never tryied it. If it's valid, would > it solve the B2BUA issue? (I don't think so as there are still > different media sessions created by different kamailio instances). Yes, you can share the same rtpproxy with different Kamailios. Saludos JesusR. ------------------------------------ Jesus Rodriguez VozTelecom Sistemas, S.L. jes...@voztele.com http://www.voztele.com Tel. 902360305 ------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
