On Jun 15, 2010 at 14:43, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at> wrote: > > -> > > > > Am 15.06.2010 12:53, schrieb Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul: > >On Jun 14, 2010 at 13:29, Steven C. Blair<bla...@isc.upenn.edu> wrote: > >> > >> I'm migrating from an older version of SER to sip-router. A syntax check > >> of my config file produces a few errors. The most confusing is : > >> > >>0(27980) WARNING:<core> [cfg.y:3364]: warning in config file > >>/home/blairs/ser-penn.cfg, line 1270, column 22-23: non constant rvalue in > >>ip comparison > >> > >>Line 1270 is the following if statement: > >> > >>if (to_ip==$g.gw_ip&& !isflagset(FLAG_PSTN_ALLOWED) > >> && !isflagset(FLAG_TOTAG) > >> && method != "ACK"&& method != "CANCEL") > >> > >>I do not see anything mentioned in config_migration.txt which explains this > >>warning. Does anyone have any thoughts on how to correct this error? > > > >You could safely ignore it. It was there just as a suggestion that comparing > >ips with non constant expressions ($g.gw_ip in this case) is not the > >fastest thing to do. I'll remove it. > > Andrei, how will the comparison be done? IP-based or string-based.
If the value is not constant then string based. If it's constant then: ip based if possible/ip, if not try string based and if that fails too try comparing with DNS(target) and if this also fails try revDNS(to_ip) with string(target). > > e.g. if the string 01.01.01.01 is compared against 1.1.1.1, will it > be identical? If 01.01.01.01 is the result of a non-constant expression, then no. > What about IPv6 addresses? Same as above. I guess I know now why I have left that warning :-) Andrei _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
