On Jul 06, 2010 at 10:24, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 7/6/10 10:16 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
> >Daniel,
> >
> >Based on this, I think I was erroneous in suggesting that plain
> >flags (setflag, isflagset) are transaction-associated. They seem
> >to be message-associated, not transaction. Is this right?
>
> in first place is associated to message, then inherited to
> transaction (when that is created) and kept for the life of the
> transaction. So both associations are true, of course, a matter of
> whether the transaction was created or not at respective time.
Not exactly, the flags are updated at t_relay() time, even if the
transaction was created before by t_newtran().
E.g.:
flags a, b;
setflag(a);
t_newtran();
setflag(b);
t_on_failure("failure_route");
t_on_reply("reply_route");
t_relay();
=> both a & b will be set in the reply_route or failure_route.
Andrei
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
