This whole 3.X migration is starting to sound quite appealing! But back to solving the immediate issue: You say I would have to have the from_uri defined for each rule. What about the ones that are current null, would they be included in any from_uri definition? Meaning that after trying with the rule where the from_uri matches, it would fail-over to where the from_uri is null? (maybe I should stop asking questions and do the test!)
//Anders On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Juha Heinanen <j...@tutpro.com> wrote: > Anders writes: > >> Talking about ugly solutions - maybe this could work: The from_uri in >> lcr always shows the domain name I have given to my customers - to >> where they send calls. So I could create a new domain name (pointing >> to the same IP), and then ask the customer to send to this domain - >> and then in lcr I would put the new domain in the from_uri, and make >> prefix with no failover for that domain. So there would be a >> `fail-over-free` solution if calls are sent to a specific domain. >> Would that work? > > it would, but only if you would have from pattern defined for each > rule. > > 3.x also allows to you define lcr instances, which are totally > independent from each other. you could assign an lcr instance to the > request based on from which customer the request comes from. > > -- juha > _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
