On 09/21/2010 11:27 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
personally I haven't tested much those functions. Maybe is better for
now to mark it obsolete and add a warning message at startup (via
fixup), then remove it with next release, allowing some maturity tests
for new ones. I am saying that also because most of existing configs
out there are using this function and new people will look for it.
I agree.
All of our configs use force_rtp_proxy(), but I would be happy to
migrate them; however, I need some reasonable assurance that
rtpproxy_offer/answer() will actually work.
As can be seen from a number of previous threads on the list, I had to
call force_rtp_proxy() to get several common scenarios to work, even
though supposedly rtpproxy_offer/answer() are just wrappers (the code
would suggest that), and even though the 'nathelper' documentation
says that supposedly they will accept and use the same flags as those
listed for force_rtp_proxy() the same way. It has not been true in my
experience.
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
1170 Peachtree Street
12th Floor, Suite 1200
Atlanta, GA 30309
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
