Daniel, What do you think about moving the (k) presence modules to standard for the next 3.1 kamailio release?
Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul <and...@iptel.org> wrote: > On Sep 28, 2010 at 11:29, Ovidiu Sas <o...@voipembedded.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul >> <and...@iptel.org> wrote: >> > >> > You mean there are no presence modules in the default config (which >> > right now uses common modules + modules comming from ser). >> > You can use the presence modules under modules_k (the ones comming from >> > kamailio), although they might not mix well with the ser-like DB (ser >> > presence modules are obsolete). >> >> If ser presence modules are obsolete, can we move them to the obsolete >> directory and promote k ones to stadard? > > They already under obsolete/, except for presence_b2b. > > Moving the k ones to standard should be ok, as soon as someone can check > that they do not depend on some modules still under modules_k (e.g. > using an API implemented in one of them) and they are independent from > the DB tables point of view (they use their own tables or tables that > are the same both in k and ser). > Basically if someone introduces them in a ser config, they wouldn't > cause any problems. > > > Andrei > _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
