Hi Klaus, thank you for your prompt reply. Yes, that is exactly what I was looking for. I wonder why I did not notice the parameter myself.
Cheers, Stefan -----Original Message----- From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at] Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 4:58 PM To: Prelle, Stefan Cc: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] tm module question Am 14.01.2011 16:52, schrieb Prelle, Stefan: > Hi folks, > > I have a problem with a scenario where an incoming INVITE is forwarded > to a redirect server which responds with 302 and a new target in the > Contact header (B). The call is being forwarded to the new contact > correctly. All responses from B that are either provisional or a 200 > OK are being routed back to the caller. If B responds with any code>=400 the > 302 from the redirect server is being returned to the caller instead of the > received code. > > A B C > |--INVITE->| | > | |--INVITE->| > | |<---302---| D > | |----INVITE--->| > | |<-----404-----| > |<---302---| > > Is this intended? And if so, is there any way to change this behaviour > so the latest received response is returned? Yes - it is intended. The lowest response code of all branches will used (RFC conform). You can change this behavior by either (I think b is what you look for). a) load another failure route in the existing failure route. in the new failure route use t_reply() to set a proper failure route b) play around with tm module parameters, especially failure_reply_mode(): http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules/tm.html#failure_reply_mode regards klaus _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
