Am 20.04.2011 16:41, schrieb Juha Heinanen: > Andreas Granig writes: > >> That's my understanding now also, however it doesn't fix the (cosmetical >> - at least for me) branch=0 issue with locally generated OPTIONS >> requests in the nathelper module: >> >> OPTIONS sip:192.168.51.1:5060 SIP/2.0 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5062;branch=0 > > ok, i haven't used those and didn't know that branch=0 doesn't fix the > issue there. in order to save cpu cycles, by suggestion was to use a > constant rfc3261 compliant branch value instead of 0.
I think a constant branch wouldn't be RFC 3261 compliant klaus _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
