Hello,
to understand the scenario:
- first branch has destination uri ($du) set
- it failed and gets to failure route where you call ds_next_domain()
and $du s still the one from first branch?
What do you mean that "not any of the nodes receive the packet ..."?
Cheers.
Daniel
On 6/10/11 6:43 PM, Evgeniy Spinov wrote:
Hello.
I had a Kamailio version of 3.0.3 and during this time configured a
failover with simple routine. In short like this:
if (ds_next_domain()) {
xlog(.....);
if (!t_relay()) {
xlog(.....);
return;
}
return;
} else {
t_reply("503");
}
Then I've updated to 3.1.3 and was happy enough until I've discovered
that my failover is not working anymore.
What is observed:
- It changes $rd variable, but not changing $du variable, is it ok?
- Not any of the nodes receive packet on t_relay after ds_next_domain().
- In route decision section, where t_on_reply() and t_on_failure() are
located I have the same t_relay() and it works fine, cause there is no
any ds_next_domains().
Is it a bug or I'm doing something wrong?
Thanks in advance.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
